On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Ana EmÃlia M. Arruda
wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Andrew Noonan wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After wrestling with a Dell TL4000 in the thread marked "Dell
>> TL4000 labeling timeout&qu
Just to close this thread out, I was able to erase the labels on the
tapes and have been successfully labeling tapes. Next stop, backups!
Thanks All!
Andrew
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Bill Arlofski wrote:
> On 06/19/2015 03:58 PM, Andrew Noonan wrote:
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>
Hi all,
After wrestling with a Dell TL4000 in the thread marked "Dell
TL4000 labeling timeout", it looks like the autochanger is going to be
fine thanks to the efforts of several people, especially Ana, on this
list.
Moving forward, I'm about to start running jobs to at first
backfill a
Hi Bill,
Yeah, I did that a few posts back. Unfortunately, there isn't a
keen mapping that specifically connects the SCSI devices to the
internal drive numbering that the changer uses, so commands against
the changer (mtx) would use the drive number, but commands against the
drive (mt) would
ILE} | grep " Storage Element [0-9]*:.*Full" | awk
> "{print \$3 \$4}" | sed "s/Full *\(:VolumeTag=\)*//"
> cat ${TMPFILE} | sed "s/ IMPORT\/EXPORT//" | grep " Storage Element
> [0-9]*:.*Full" | awk "{print \$3 \$4}" | sed &
t; Hello,
>
> 2015-06-18 4:35 GMT+02:00 Andrew Noonan :
>> @Marcin - dmesg is clean
>>
>> @Ana - I ~think~ /dev/changer is created by udev, I'm not 100%. It's
>> a symlink to sg19 in this case:
>>
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Jun 10 17:06 /dev/change
uot; and "sg_map -x"?
>
> Best regards,
> Ana
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Josh Fisher wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/17/2015 10:35 PM, Andrew Noonan wrote:
>> > @Marcin - dmesg is clean
>> >
>> > @Ana - I ~think~ /dev/change
gt; Best regards,
> Ana
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Marcin Haba wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Do you have any errors in dmesg (hardware errors, bus reset, SCSI
>> errors ... etc.) ?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Marcin Haba (gani)
>>
>&g
ike it ever gets to that state during load.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Andrew
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Andrew Noonan wrote:
> Hi Ana,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I'm adding those into the drives. BTW,
> 900 is the value. Having no real experience with these, is it
&g
value:
>
> wait_for_drive() {
> i=0
> while [ $i -le 300 ]; do # Wait max 300 seconds
>
> Best regards,
> Ana
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Andrew Noonan wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm almost completely new to tape. We'v
Hi all,
I'm almost completely new to tape. We've been doing disk-based
backups for years, but we now have a project where we want to offsite
hundreds of TB permanently, and have a Dell TL4000 (a rebranded IBM
3573-TL from the looks of it) with 2 ULT3580 LTO-6 drives. We're
running bacula 5.2. T
On Thu, August 16, 2007 2:29 pm, Martin Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:02:05 -0500 (CDT), Andrew Noonan said:
>> Importance: Normal
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm running 2.0.3 on several linux machines
Hi all,
I'm running 2.0.3 on several linux machines. All the FDs are installed
from the RPMs provided on the site, and all the FDs show links to the ZLIB
libraries on an LDD. I have a several jobs for each server. One of these jobs
is what I call the "Small Set", as the size of the file
13 matches
Mail list logo