Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with Verify

2009-03-13 Thread Alex Bremer
2009/3/12, Ralf Gross : > I can't see anything obvious. > > Is the number of files in the job output of your first mail correct? > Do the 70,966 match the number of files in the backup job report? > > Files Expected: 70,966 > Files Examined: 70,966 Yes, the numbers of the backup jo

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with Verify

2009-03-12 Thread Alex Bremer
2009/3/12, Ralf Gross : > The verify is done in the fd, so I would addd the debug option there > too. And also to the sd, because if bacula complains about a file that > is missing on the volume, you might find the answer there. Yes, I did this, but at least the fd logfile does not seem to contain

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with Verify

2009-03-12 Thread Alex Bremer
2009/3/11, Ralf Gross : > So the volume only has 7 volume files (markers/chunks). You could add > -d 100 or 200 to the daemon options in the bacula-fd start script on > the client where the verify is running and redirect the output to a > file. Thanks for that tip. I added -d 100 to all of the sta

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with Verify

2009-03-11 Thread Alex Bremer
2009/3/10, Ralf Gross : > Hm, no idea what the problem is. But file 7 is not a real backed up > file, it's some kind of mark that bacula writes to the volume. > > Can you check the volume with bscan? Yes, seems to work - I tried the '-r' option and bscan did not complain: # bs