Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula BETA 2.1.26 released to Source Forge

2007-07-18 Thread Adam Thornton
On Jul 12, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Thursday 12 July 2007 15:21, Dan Langille wrote: >> On 12 Jul 2007 at 15:15, Kern Sibbald wrote: >>> If no one wants to test the Win32 version and report back on it >>> (particularly Vista, Vista VSS, and reparse points), I will test it >>> my

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula GUI

2007-05-01 Thread Adam Thornton
On Apr 26, 2007, at 4:59 PM, Adam Thornton wrote: > On Apr 26, 2007, at 4:41 PM, Dan Langille wrote: >> Fruity is the configuration tool for Nagios. I suggest that such a >> tool for Bacula would be useful too. >> >> However, all configuration files should be pla

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula GUI

2007-05-01 Thread Adam Thornton
On Apr 26, 2007, at 4:41 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > Fruity is the configuration tool for Nagios. I suggest that such a > tool for Bacula would be useful too. > > However, all configuration files should be plain text. Much like > what Fruity does. Unlike Nagios, Bacula already has an include direc

Re: [Bacula-devel] Re: [Bacula-users] Win32 Version 1.38.5

2006-03-03 Thread Adam Thornton
On Mar 2, 2006, at 12:19 AM, Landon Fuller wrote: On Mar 1, 2006, at 2:15 AM, Chris Crowther wrote: Landon Fuller wrote: Who is generally handles the Win32 Bacula builds? Whoever it is has a lot of patience or luck, having tried to do it myself :) Does anyone know if it'