On Wed, Mar 5, 2025, at 4:12 PM, Udo Kaune wrote:
> Am 05.03.25 um 17:08 schrieb Dan Langille:
>
>> I would be curious to see if you are able to send traffic directly from host
>> to host without any VPN involved, though I think simply testing the remote
>> end's ability to download a large file
On 3/5/25 12:30 PM, John Lockard wrote:
I have a system which I'm backing up and have it set up for "Always Incremental" backups. I ran a Full job by hand and have
schedules for Differentials and Incrementals, and once a week Bacula will roll up and Incr and Diff jobs greater than 30 days
along
Am 05.03.25 um 17:08 schrieb Dan Langille:
I would be curious to see if you are able to send traffic directly from host to
host without any VPN involved, though I think simply testing the remote end's
ability to download a large file successfully could be more important.
The hosts have been in
I have a system which I'm backing up and have it set up for "Always
Incremental" backups. I ran a Full job by hand and have schedules for
Differentials and Incrementals, and once a week Bacula will roll up and
Incr and Diff jobs greater than 30 days along with the existing Full into a
rolling Full
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025, at 9:27 AM, Rob Gerber wrote:
>
>
> Robert Gerber
> 402-237-8692
> r...@craeon.net
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2025, 8:06 AM Dan Langille wrote:
>> __
>> On Tue, Mar 4, 2025, at 11:03 PM, Rob Gerber wrote:
>>> I don't think that the problem is in bacula, for sure. I suspect other
>
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025, at 9:53 AM, Udo Kaune wrote:
> Am 05.03.25 um 15:27 schrieb Rob Gerber:
>>> Which also means, this is not a Bacula issue but a transport issue - solve
>>> that first, and the Bacula issue should resolve.
>>>
>>> Does that make sense?
>> I agree with your conclusion. This appe
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025, at 11:03 PM, Rob Gerber wrote:
> I don't think that the problem is in bacula, for sure. I suspect other
> traffic over the link might be similarly impacted. My searching indicated
> that 0a000119 is a generic openssl error. Could be many things. I might be
> suspicious of th
Am 05.03.25 um 15:27 schrieb Rob Gerber:
Which also means, this is not a Bacula issue but a transport issue - solve
that first, and the Bacula issue should resolve.
Does that make sense?
I agree with your conclusion. This appears to be a transport issue.
A special error condition co
Robert Gerber
402-237-8692
r...@craeon.net
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025, 8:06 AM Dan Langille wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2025, at 11:03 PM, Rob Gerber wrote:
>
> I don't think that the problem is in bacula, for sure. I suspect other
> traffic over the link might be similarly impacted. My searching indicated
