Thank you for bringing this up, John, and thank you for reviewing the code,
Martin.
I have submitted a documentation bug report in the bacula gitlab.
Regards,
Robert Gerber
402-237-8692
r...@craeon.net
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 6:33 AM Martin Simmons wrote:
> According to the code, it also allow
I had another idea. What if you try bacula progressive virtual full backups?
I do not know if you have heard of this method. You take a full backup,
then do incremental backups for a period of time, like one month. Then you
consolidate the previous full backup with the incremental backups. This
gi
I think there will no problem having one set of pools per FD, but maybe it
increases complexity for you. Otherwise, no space savings.
I have a couple ideas.
1. Bacula has the 'aligned' plugin. If you use the aligned plugin, it
attempts to better align blocks found on disk in the volumes. It does
Hi Rob,
I understood well since our first exchange that the MaximumVolumes at 1
was a heresy. I also understood well that to best manage several
volumes, it remained important to separate Full, Diff and Inc in
different pools. So, we are returning substantially to what I already
have.
On the other
According to the code, it also allows 6, 7 and 8:
case '6': /* compare XXHASH64 */
do_Digest = CRYPTO_DIGEST_XXHASH64;
break;
case '7': /* compare XXH3_64 */
do_Digest = CRYPTO_DIGEST_XXH3_64;
