On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 at 09:45, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> So that means for best protection I would need "storage daemon data
> volume encryption"? Or even better: enable both?
>
> I assume enabling both would add overhead in terms of CPU usage etc
Hello Stefan,
I think the same as Bill that u
Justin,
I don't have answers to all your questions (really, to any of your specific
questions, anyhow). I do have some thoughts, though.
Please keep in mind that compared to many on this list, I'm a bacula
novice. I might get something wrong. I also haven't entirely understood the
problems you're
On 10/21/24 1:45 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
So that means for best protection I would need "storage daemon data
volume encryption"? Or even better: enable both?
I assume enabling both would add overhead in terms of CPU usage etc
Hello Stefan,
Not sure I would call FD encryption plus SD
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 13:15:16 +0200, Justin Case said:
>
> I have browsed the catalog database a bit more and I saw one thing that might
> explain the problem I am having, but I don't have sufficient technical
> background on the Bacula implementation details of different versions.
>
> I a
Am 20.10.24 um 20:13 schrieb Marcin Haba:
There is an option "Volume encryption" in the cloud storage resource, I
assume this would be redundant, right?
This is the storage daemon data volume encryption directive. It is not
used for the file daemon encryption.
As far as I understand if the f
