[Bacula-users] Ceph S3 support in Bacula Community 13.0.3

2023-10-02 Thread Levi Wilbert
I'm running Bacula Community 13.0.3 in RHEL9, and having trouble getting the s3 plugin working w/ Ceph. I've done a bit of reading in the docs, and have been finding info conflicting/confusing info that S3 Ceph may not be supported under Community? On this page (for Bacula 11: https://www.bacul

Re: [Bacula-users] Extraction of a specific file

2023-10-02 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 10/2/23 13:39, Rob Gerber wrote: I'm not sure, but maybe you'll need to query your database directly instead of relying on Bacula to simplify that process. *This is not an educated answer, just my novice guess.* I see bacula bconsole has a 'query' command that I believe passes SQL query la

Re: [Bacula-users] Extraction of a specific file

2023-10-02 Thread Rob Gerber
I'm not sure, but maybe you'll need to query your database directly instead of relying on Bacula to simplify that process. *This is not an educated answer, just my novice guess.* I see bacula bconsole has a 'query' command that I believe passes SQL query language commands on to the relevant DB ser

Re: [Bacula-users] Adding missing foreign keys to PostgreSQL - avoiding dbcheck

2023-10-02 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2023 09:54:51 -0400, Dan Langille said: > > Hello, > > The Bacula PostgreSQL schema is missing several foreign keys (FK). Foreign > keys are not a new database concept; they've been around for decades. They > are reliable and robust. > > Wednesday, I started a dbcheck on a

Re: [Bacula-users] Adding missing foreign keys to PostgreSQL - avoiding dbcheck

2023-10-02 Thread Marco Gaiarin
Mandi! Dan Langille In chel di` si favelave... > I have no timeline for this work, but just posting the intent often gives me > the incentive to get started. Thanks for the effort. I can confirm that i've also hit DB performance trouble in postgres, so solving in the 'correct DB way' would be

Re: [Bacula-users] Progressive Virtual Fulls...

2023-10-02 Thread Marco Gaiarin
> Next week i'll give it a try. Thanks. Finally seems i'm a working 'VirtualFull' configuration! *run job=FVG-SV-Obito level=VirtualFull Run Backup job JobName: FVG-SV-Obito Level:VirtualFull Client: fvg-sv-obito-fd FileSet: ObitoTestStd Pool: FVG-SV-ObitoFilePoolIncremental (From

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and BBR Protocol for Internet Backups, Packet Losses, Disconnections, etc.

2023-10-02 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 10/2/23 09:47, hei...@bacula.com.br wrote: > I've enabled this now on all of my hosts, but I'm honestly not seeing a > clear improvement in network throughput so far. The improvements are more notiable if you introduce packet losses or networ interruptions. Ah, so, all the things I've d

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and BBR Protocol for Internet Backups, Packet Losses, Disconnections, etc.

2023-10-02 Thread heitor
Hello Phil, >> I would like to share this finding regarding the Linux BBR TCP  >> congestion protocol and Bacula. >> I've tested in a few production environments, but I would like to have a  >> broather population of >> results: >> https://www.bacula.lat/bacula-e-prototoclo-bbr-para-backups-via-i

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and BBR Protocol for Internet Backups, Packet Losses, Disconnections, etc.

2023-10-02 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 9/14/23 18:08, hei...@bacula.com.br wrote: Hello Bacula Users, I would like to share this finding regarding the Linux BBR TCP congestion protocol and Bacula. I've tested in a few production environments, but I would like to have a broather population of results: https://www.bacula.lat/bacu