On 9/29/23 06:07, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
Mandi! Josh Fisher via Bacula-users
In chel di` si favelave...
I'm really getting mad. This make sense for the behaviour (the first
VirtualFull worked because read full and incremental for the same pool) but
still the docs confuse me.
https:/
Mandi! Josh Fisher via Bacula-users
In chel di` si favelave...
>> I'm really getting mad. This make sense for the behaviour (the first
>> VirtualFull worked because read full and incremental for the same pool) but
>> still the docs confuse me.
>> https://www.bacula.org/9.4.x-manuals/en/
Mandi! Rados??aw Korzeniewski
In chel di` si favelave...
> There is always a cost, from one area to another. You can mitigate storage
> cost in this case with deduplication. So, the cost shifts from storage and
> time to cpu, memory and license price. :)
> And everybody can choose what is the be
