On 2022-11-30 20:00, Agiofws Holylight wrote:
Thank you for the clarification
You are welcome.
Regards
--
Josip Deanovic
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Can I install baculum with bacula director version 9.6.x in debian 11 or
do I have to upgrade to bacula 11?
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
On 2022-11-30 18:34, Agiofws Holylight wrote:
But the ""The Recycle Oldest Volume = yes record" will respect
retention
dates right?
I'm just asking through this thread because I have about 16 volumes in
my
increment pool and none have expired so the job is just waiting for a
new
volume with
On 2022-11-30 13:34, Agiofws Holylight wrote:
So the Directive "Purge Oldest Volume = yes" will ignore
retention settings on the volume?
Yes.
Here is the relevant part from Bacula documentation:
"The Purge Oldest Volume = yes record in the Pool resource permits a
forced recycling of the oldes
Hello,
I just made a new installation of bacula 9.6.7 and Bacula web baculum in order
to make some extra production tests
I was suprised to see in the bauculum interface some @@ before and after menus
names , surrounding each field names
Like @@Welcome@@ or @@Pools@@ or @@Clients:@@
I don't
On 2022-11-30 11:02, Agiofws Holylight wrote:
Hello is the way forcing Bacula to use the oldest volume in a pool
ignoring
retention periods?
I have a kind of situation where due to the size all the data being
backed
up bacula used more than one volume per job so now my oldest volumes
have
not
Hello is the way forcing Bacula to use the oldest volume in a pool ignoring
retention periods?
I have a kind of situation where due to the size all the data being backed
up bacula used more than one volume per job so now my oldest volumes have
not exceeded the retention. So bacula will not recycle
