On 10/07/2021 23:12, Jose Alberto wrote:
This brings us to other discussions haha.
Installation preference?
What's to discuss?? Binaries, scripts, configuration and so on go under
/opt/bacula, messages get logged to syslogd, and if the package spits
mail, have it spit mail somewhere sensible
This brings us to other discussions haha.
Installation preference?
Compiled or official binaries?
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 9:09 AM Jose Alberto wrote:
> In addition to what your colleagues have recommended.
>
> The important thing is that you use it on supported systems and that you
> as Sysadm
In addition to what your colleagues have recommended.
The important thing is that you use it on supported systems and that you as
Sysadmin feel comfortable and dominate.
I am a Debian User since 3.0, my preference is Debian. But I have also
installed Bacula on Centos and it has worked without pro
On 10.07.21 00:54, Heitor Faria wrote:
That said,
I would be very happy to run Bacula on any version of Debian -- the
Bacula packagers for Debian work closely with the Bacula project --
I would be a lot happier if they would learn to install it in
/opt/bacula instead of sprea
