Hi all,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:32:18PM +, Martin Simmons wrote:
> Why 3x? The value in tne message is almost 197x the original, but is almost
> certainly a junk value anyway.
>
sorry, I meant the value that bacula complained about not being able
to allocate upped to 30... instead of 19
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:22:51 +0100, Uwe Schuerkamp said:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> thanks for all your suggestions. I compiled 9.6.7 from source and
> "patched" catreq.c to increase the maximum attribute spool size to 3x
> the original value.
Why 3x? The value in tne message is almost 197x the or
On 2/15/21 2:14 PM, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:47:52 -0500, Josh Fisher said:
On 2/12/21 12:53 PM, Martin Simmons wrote:
I don't understand the comment about "refactor" or "all instances" unless
there are other errors as well.
By refactor, he means that when the function
Hi folks,
thanks for all your suggestions. I compiled 9.6.7 from source and
"patched" catreq.c to increase the maximum attribute spool size to 3x
the original value.
Sadly I don't have the time to debug this error on a deeper level at
the moment, disk space is plenty on the director (around 400GB
