Hello,
śr., 7 paź 2020 o 06:37 Рукавцов Дмитрий Геннадьевич
napisał(a):
> So, there is no solution? Bacula can't backup such clients?
>
I know nothing about windows filesystem deduplication capabilities, but I
assume to properly read contents of these files a standard win32
BackupRead() dedicate
Hello,
śr., 30 wrz 2020 o 12:33 Ben Laurie napisał(a):
>
>
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 09:42, Radosław Korzeniewski <
> rados...@korzeniewski.net> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> pon., 28 wrz 2020 o 14:34 Ben Laurie napisał(a):
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2020 at 18:58, Josip Deanovic
>>> wrote:
>>>
>
So, there is no solution? Bacula can't backup such clients?
Maybe i explained something wrong. I have bacula server on centos
(server), i don't have any deduplication on the bacula server and i
don't need it there. I have windows 2019 server (client), it has it's
own deduplication on it's own
Hello,
We are pleased to announce a new Baculum 9.6.6.1 version. This is a
minor new feature and bug fix release. It introduces new functions to
the Security page which help creating user accounts with restricted
Bacula resources access. Binary packages for popular distributions are
available alre
Hi,
I have done some testing:
a) testing storage with dd command (eg: dd if=/dev/zero
of=/storage/test1.img bs=1G count=1 oflag=dsync). The results are:
-writing to IBM storage (with cloud enabled) shows 300 MB/sec
-writing to local SSD storage shows 600 MB/sec.
I guess storage is not a bottlene
On 10/6/20 3:45 AM, Žiga Žvan wrote:
I believe that I have my spooling attributes set correctly on jobdefs
(see bellow). Spool attributes = yes; Spool data defaults to no. Any
other idea for performance problems?
Regard,
Ziga
The client version is very old. First try updating the client to
Hello Ziga,
Your client is probably too old for the 9.2.x Director.
Even CentOS 6 is old, most likely in the end of life.
Other than that you can try some tuning:
http://www.bacula.lat/tuning-better-performance-and-treatment-of-backup-bottlenecks/?lang=en
Rgds.
--
MSc Heitor Faria
CEO Bacula Lat
On 2020-10-06 02:07, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 9/28/20 12:33 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
test phase 1: All clients and Storage on 9.6.6, Director still on
9.6.3
No hung jobs so far. I plan to leave it this way for at least a week
before upgrading the Director to 9.6.6. as well.
OK, a week of
I believe that I have my spooling attributes set correctly on jobdefs
(see bellow). Spool attributes = yes; Spool data defaults to no. Any
other idea for performance problems?
Regard,
Ziga
JobDefs {
Name = "bazar2-job"
Type = Backup
Level = Incremental
Client = bazar2.kranj.cetrtapot.
Hi,
I'm having some performance challenges. I would appreciate some educated
guess from an experienced bacula user.
I'm changing old backup sw that writes to tape drive with bacula
writing to disk. The results are:
a) windows file server backup from a deduplicated drive (1.700.000
files, 90
10 matches
Mail list logo
