Re: [Bacula-users] areas for improvement?

2020-06-12 Thread Dmitri Maziuk
On 6/12/2020 12:39 PM, David Brodbeck wrote: None of this, of course, is an issue when backing up always-on servers with static IPs -- which is Bacula's focus. Not really: what's happening is if an intermediate node goes down, IP will find a different route -- *at the network layer*. We nor

Re: [Bacula-users] areas for improvement?

2020-06-12 Thread Heitor Faria
Hello David, > It's fair to argue that both NAT routers and VPNs are a corruption of TCP/IP's > design intent, but it doesn't seem likely we'll be rid of them any time soon. > Bacula doesn't work very well with either. Besides the connection drop issues, > I haven't yet gotten client-initiated ba

Re: [Bacula-users] areas for improvement?

2020-06-12 Thread David Brodbeck
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 8:41 AM Josh Fisher wrote: > I still feel that Bacula's design is correct. Yes, 802.3az changes the > always-on nature of a connection, allowing either side to temporarily > power down its transmitter to save energy, but the standard itself > doesn't change the original go

[Bacula-users] Bacula Release 9.6.5

2020-06-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Unfortunately due to a Enterprise backport of code to the Community version, three files were released to version 9.6.4 with Enterprise copyrights.  In addition there were apparently several missing image files in the documentation.  Thus we have withdrawn version 9.6.4 and replaced it wit