Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-FD - RedHat

2019-08-16 Thread William Muriithi
Hello Maurizio, If you are deploying on a new server, don't use RHEL 7. Use RHEL 8. It will allow you to yum install a more recent Bacula-fd. Alternatively, you avoid RedHat provided rpm and use upstream RPM instead. Regards, William From: Maurizio Cal

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-FD - RedHat

2019-08-16 Thread William Muriithi
Hi Maurizio Hmm, now I understand. Disregard my previous answer. Your director and storage are 5.2.5, so the best suggestion is as per Alexey suggestion. Use 5.2.13. Its still don't look like its likely to work considering the fd will be newer than director, but you could try... Or just upd

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-FD - RedHat

2019-08-16 Thread Alexey Kazakov
Hi Maurizio! EPEL repository https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL for Centos/RHEL 7 contains bacula version 5.2.13 rpm packages. Am not sure if FD 5.12.13 is compatible with director 5.2.5, but version numbers are close enough, maybe it's worth the try? --- Alexey Kazakov В Fri, 16 Aug 2019 18

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula-FD - RedHat

2019-08-16 Thread Wanderlei Huttel
Hello Maurizio You can compile from source: https://sourceforge.net/projects/bacula/files/bacula/ Best regards *Wanderlei Hüttel* http://www.bacula.com.br Em sex, 16 de ago de 2019 às 13:41, Maurizio Caloro escreveu: > Hello Together > > > > Please i have here meny differnt older linux Serve

[Bacula-users] Bacula-FD - RedHat

2019-08-16 Thread Maurizio Caloro
Hello Together Please i have here meny differnt older linux Server's and the Backup Bacula Server are running Version 5.2.5. I know this are outdated. But i need to install Bacula-fd to this new Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) Please can are possible you can give me the p

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore job failure reasons

2019-08-16 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 17:42:07 +, William Muriithi said: > > Hello > > We have a bacula server that been running fine for a while. I have > previously done test restore to ensure that the backups are usable with > success until now. > > So this being the first time I have seen a faile