On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:47:49 -0600 Dimitri Maziuk via
Bacula-users wrote:
> Check that wal archive_mode is off in
> postgresql.conf and also all replication-related
> stuff.
grep -iE "replic|archive_mode" postgresql.conf
shows only commented lines. Need I change anything?
> Try `psql -U postgre
PS
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/sql-checkpoint.html
--
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@l
Sorry it’s late – I don’t read the Bacula list every day.
We successfully use a Neo T24, LTO-6, SAS interface, LSI SAS 9207-8e
controller, on UB 18.04LTS in ESXi 6.0 (you have to use hardware passthrough on
the SAS controller card to use a SAS tape drive in ESXi).
We previously used a Tandberg
On 11/20/2018 04:56 PM, George Anchev via Bacula-users wrote:
> On the link I read wal_keep_segments "Specifies the
> *minimum* number of past log file segments kept in the
> pg_wal directory". Isn't there a setting which
> controls the *maximum* number/volume/retention of those
> files? (like in
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 16:34:58 -0600 Dimitri Maziuk via
Bacula-users wrote:
> I've 320MB on a server that replicates a database of
> a few million rows, and ~100MB on our bacula server
> w/ a year's worth of backups. What do you call "too
> big"?
As shared in the first message: Right now, even afte
On 11/20/2018 03:49 PM, George Anchev via Bacula-users wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:16:52 -0600 Dimitri Maziuk via
> Bacula-users wrote:
>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/routine-vacuuming.html
>
> Good info. Thanks.
>
>> WAL: don't worry about it unless you want to archive
>> them or r
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:16:52 -0600 Dimitri Maziuk via
Bacula-users wrote:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/routine-vacuuming.html
Good info. Thanks.
> WAL: don't worry about it unless you want to archive
> them or replicate your database.
But the pg_wal directory is way too big and I have n
