On 10/25/2018 04:16 PM, Sean Ellis wrote:
> Hi, I have a very basic question. I've been looking around for an answer
> but haven't been able to satisfy myself thus far. My question concerns
> making changes to existing jobs and configuration. I recently read that
> changing retention times on volum
Any News Davide?
Best regards
*Wanderlei Hüttel*
http://www.bacula.com.br
Em ter, 16 de out de 2018 às 08:03, Davide Franco
escreveu:
> Hello Wanderlei,
>
> I’ve been too busy over the last few weeks to produce binary packages for
> latest Bacula version. Sorry for that.
>
> Bacula 9.2.1 pack
Hi, I have a very basic question. I've been looking around for an answer
but haven't been able to satisfy myself thus far. My question concerns
making changes to existing jobs and configuration. I recently read that
changing retention times on volumes or pools takes a few steps and may
not be refl
Hi Marcin,
Thank you for that I will be able to restart my puppet testing tomorrow morning
then.
Best,
Jean-Marc
> On 25 Oct 2018, at 20:21, Marcin Haba wrote:
>
> Hello Jean-Marc,
>
> The Baculum packages version 9.2.1-2 are on place again. I am sorry
> for this inconvinience.
>
> Now I tr
Hello Marcin
Thanks for confirming the issue. I'll edit the conf as you suggest.
Regards
Chris Wilkinson
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, 6:20 p.m. Marcin Haba, wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> I am seeing the problem with the error page and links. I fixed it and
> in next versions you should be able to go to c
Hello Jean-Marc,
The Baculum packages version 9.2.1-2 are on place again. I am sorry
for this inconvinience.
Now I try to explain what has happened.
Best regards.
Marcin Haba (gani)
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 20:04, Marcin Haba wrote:
>
> Hello Jean-Marc,
>
> I have no idea why in the repositories
Hello Jean-Marc,
I have no idea why in the repositories are old packages. It looks that
they were reverted somehow. I didn't do anything with the repositories
since time when I uploaded version 9.2.1-2.
Summary - the valid version is 9.2.1-2. I will try to copy it to the
server once again and I l
Hello Ken,
Thank you for the confirmation that the solution worked on your side.
Also thank you for translating the Baculum into Japanese. I appreciate
your help.
Best regards.
Marcin Haba (gani)
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 04:47, KEN SAWADA wrote:
>
> Hello Marcin
>
> The authority has been changed
Hello Chris,
I am seeing the problem with the error page and links. I fixed it and
in next versions you should be able to go to config wizard to change
the password.
Workarround for you can be editing this file on host with Baculum Web:
/usr/share/baculum/htdocs/protected/Web/Config/hosts.conf
Hello,
I have successfully deployed Bacula 9.2.1 with Baculum on a test server,
and while testing my puppet script for automated deployment I realized that
the provided RPMs for CentOS:
https://www.bacula.org/downloads/baculum/stable/centos/ have suddenly
rolled back to the precedent buggy versio
Hi List !
I have a pretty nasty issue here, we had a robot reboot itself while bacula
believed the tape was parked at a n file, so bacula kept appending to the tape,
even though the tape got rewound.
(We believe)
So when we try mounting the tape we get:
24-Oct 14:08 technicos.xxx-sd JobId 3001: W
Good morning Jérôme,
Tried it on a smaller database of bacula (2.7G, from another server) and it
removed 53k orphaned files
I guess i won't see the size difference in the .db file, but in the SQL
generated file when I backup the catalog
The SQL has the same size as before the dbcheck (but at le
HI,
I just thought about something you may have not setup yet.
Do you regularly check your catalog with bcheck ?
Typically, weekly, I run the following command: /usr/bin/yes yes |
/usr/sbin/dbcheck -c /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf -C Catalog1 -b -f
It cleans lot of mess in the database.
HTH.
13 matches
Mail list logo
