Re: [Bacula-users] RunAfterJob

2018-06-06 Thread Bill Arlofski
On 06/06/2018 08:48 AM, Donna Hofmeister wrote: > In a job{} definition, is it possible/advisable/wise to have multiple > RunAfterJob statements? Hello Donna, Yes, it is possible. > If so, does N+1 wait on N to complete?          - d Yes. However, there is not a 100% guarantee that they will

Re: [Bacula-users] RunAfterJob

2018-06-06 Thread Dan Langille
> On Jun 6, 2018, at 10:48 AM, Donna Hofmeister wrote: > > In a job{} definition, is it possible/advisable/wise to have multiple > RunAfterJob statements? > > If so, does N+1 wait on N to complete? - d I understand it is possible. My preference would be just one. Make is a /bin/sh sc

[Bacula-users] RunAfterJob

2018-06-06 Thread Donna Hofmeister
In a job{} definition, is it possible/advisable/wise to have multiple RunAfterJob statements? If so, does N+1 wait on N to complete? - d -- Donna Hofmeister Allegro Consultants, Inc. 408-252-2330 Visit us on Linkedin Like us on

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula h/w write fails, but tar writes w/out error?

2018-06-06 Thread Josh Fisher
On 6/5/2018 3:45 PM, Stieneke, Dan wrote: Ubuntu 16.04, Bacula 5.2.6, single-drive autoloader, all running Bacula trouble-free for years. Four months ago I got some errors in Bacula that looked like h/w errors, although jobs using tar on the same drive ran without error. I had suspicions a

[Bacula-users] Upgraded to Fedora 29 and got an unresolved dependency (libbaccats)

2018-06-06 Thread Bill Damage via Bacula-users
In desperation after the upgrade I removed bacula hoping a reinstall would fix the broken dependencies but got floored by this: [root@tiger bacula]# bacula-dirbash: bacula-dir: command not found...Install package 'bacula-director' to provide command 'bacula-dir'? [N/y] y  * Waiting in queue... *