Thank you Kern,
the PVF whitepaper is a great help, because every aspect is declared
exactly in this paper.
I didn't knew it before.
And thank you Bill also for your prompt answer.
I've only just seen the following PVF demonstration:
https://www.baculasystems.com/ml/pvf3.svg#PVF-title
and thi
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 3:58:24 PM SAST Ian Douglas wrote:
> Let me try and upgrade Bacula on the SD box and see if that fixes things.
> Hope the CentOS version has been updated.
Yum update and restarted SD, just in case.
A happy ending to test backup of catalogue.
Termination:
This will seem a dumb question to the experienced Bacula user. I would
prefer to use mysql rather than the default sqlite. During installation
(Debian Stretch repo, Bacula v7.4.4) I said no to configuring sqlite
expecting to be offered the opportunity to configure mysql instead. That
didn't happen.
I can't speak for Alfred, but I would love to see example configs of how
to set up a progressive virtual-full, the underlying jobs, pools, etc.
I'm sure I could muddle my way through it using the documentation, but I
find working from examples to be a good bit easier. Also more likely to
not only
Hello Heitor,
All the white papers are created in pdf format. To change it would
require Bacula Systems to change their policies. The Bacula Systems
white papers are in general not published on the web. I say "in
general" because I do sometimes modify their white papers to suit the
communi
On 18-05-23 09:15 -0400, Josh Fisher wrote:
On 5/23/2018 2:48 AM, Panayiotis Gotsis wrote:
Hello
We have a setup with two storage daemons but, up till now, I have not
really checked whether there is concurrency. We have not yet installed
v9 to see whether there is any major change, but general
hi
On Wednesday, 23 May 2018 3:44:32 PM SAST you wrote:
> bacula-dir and bacula-sd always must be in the same version
I suspected as much (from previous battles) but I checked status via Bat and
director seems to talk to SD okay so I thought it was maybe backwards-
compatible.
Let me try and u
Hello Ian
Can you inform the version of all daemons (bacula-dir, bacula-sd and
bacula-fd) ? bacula-dir and bacula-sd always must be in the same version,
and bacula-fd never can't be in a higher version o bacula-dir
Is interesting include heartbeat interval in all bacula configuration, like
below:
Many thanks to all who responded.
Regards
Chris Wilkinson
On Wed, 23 May 2018, 2:16 p.m. itlinux_igtp, wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> From the official repos you can get 7.4.4.
> apt-cache showpkg bacula
> Package: bacula
> Versions:
> 7.4.4+dfsg-6
> (/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.de.debian.org_debian_dists_str
hi
Google won't tell me the answer so I need to ask the experts...
Looks like my Bacula on this box (director, fd, and database via Postgres)
updated.
Now I get errors like this:
23-May 14:09 trooper-dir JobId 18205: Start Backup JobId 18205,
Job=BackupCatalog.2018-05-23_14.09.13_08
23-May 1
Hi Chris,
From the official repos you can get 7.4.4.
apt-cache showpkg bacula
Package: bacula
Versions:
7.4.4+dfsg-6
(/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.de.debian.org_debian_dists_stretch_main_binary-amd64_Packages)
Description Language:
File:
/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.de.debian.org_debian_d
On 5/23/2018 2:48 AM, Panayiotis Gotsis wrote:
Hello
We have a setup with two storage daemons but, up till now, I have not
really checked whether there is concurrency. We have not yet installed
v9 to see whether there is any major change, but generally speaking,
the queue handling from bacula l
Hello, Kern,
Hijacking the thread a little bit, perhaps bacula.org should reconsider the PDF
usage.
Not everybody agrees with me, but PDFs have a lower Google search rank, are
hard to find, difficult to copy configuration samples, heavy and provide bad
reading on regular screens => https://kula
$ apt policy bacula
bacula:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 7.4.4+dfsg-6
Version table:
9.0.7+dfsg-4 750
750 http://debian.noc.ntua.gr/debian testing/main amd64
Packages
750 http://debian.noc.ntua.gr/debian testing/main i386
Packages
50 http://debian.noc.ntua.gr/debian u
On 23.05.2018 11:52, Chris Wilkinson wrote:
> What version of Bacula is currently provided through apt-get?
Debian provides 7.4.4 in the native Stretch repository and 9.0.7 via
stretch-backports:
https://packages.debian.org/source/stable/bacula
https://packages.debian.org/source/stretch-backport
What version of Bacula is currently provided through apt-get?
Regards
Chris Wilkinson
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot__
Hello,
Perhaps the PVF whitepaper would help you if you have not already seen
it: www.bacula.orgt -> Documentation -> White Papers -> Progressive ...
On 05/22/2018 02:08 PM, Alfred Weintoegl wrote:
In "New Features in 9.0.0 - Progressive Virtual Full" documentation it
says:
"The new direc
Yes, I agree. I have now fixed the problems you pointed out and
committed it. Thanks.
On 05/21/2018 07:05 PM, Martin Simmons wrote:
Hi Kern,
My guess is that ua->jcr->pool was initialized (by set_jcr_defaults?) to
points to Rasmus's ProjectsArchive pool, so ua->jcr->pool->cleaning_prefix is
Hello
We have a setup with two storage daemons but, up till now, I have not
really checked whether there is concurrency. We have not yet installed
v9 to see whether there is any major change, but generally speaking,
the queue handling from bacula leaves a lot to be desired.
The point of my respo
19 matches
Mail list logo
