On 04/09/2018 10:37 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Honestly, this is an endemic problem with Red Hat. ...And yet then they
> leap headlong at unproven, misconceived projects like systemd.
The problem is sharing the loot. Software that comes with paid support
from "not Red Hat" gets a rather low pr
> Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti 9.4.2018 kello 19.01:
>
>
>
>> Johannsen, Thorsten kirjoitti 5.4.2018 kello
>> 16.17:
>>
>> On 05.04.2018 13:35, Johannsen, Thorsten wrote:
>>> On 05.04.2018 00:01, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jari,
>>>
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>>> Do you have Raspbian insta
> Johannsen, Thorsten kirjoitti 5.4.2018 kello
> 16.17:
>
> On 05.04.2018 13:35, Johannsen, Thorsten wrote:
>> On 05.04.2018 00:01, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jari,
>>
>>
>> [...]
>
>> Do you have Raspbian installed? Do you use the bacula-fd version from the
>> repository or did you
> Johannsen, Thorsten kirjoitti 5.4.2018 kello
> 14.35:
>
> On 05.04.2018 00:01, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
> Hi Jari,
>
>
> [...]
> One of the Raspi's (heRPI01) is being backed up without any problems. The
> other one (heRPI02), however, refused to make
> backups after a first
Try using the .spec files that are released with Bacula 9.0.6 rather
than the RedHat spec files. If you are using the community .spec files,
let me know and I will make sure that they are the same ones our
packager is using (sometimes packagers modify packages but the changes
don't always get
Sorry, I do not recall. In general we have fewer problems using
g++ than the native compilers. In principle either compiler
should be OK.
On 04/05/2018 03:55 PM, Mike Eggleston
wrote:
Kern,
Hello,
The output from lsscsi looks odd. From what I see, I am not reassured
that both the tape drives are actually part one at a time and see if
physically the right tapes are mounted.
I also am a bit skeptical about using a 40GB maximum file size on your
LTO-4 -- that seems *much* larger
On 04/09/18 11:31, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On 04/02/2018 08:52 PM, dhofmeister wrote:
>> what's "out there" for centos is bacula 5.2 and the current bacula version
>> is 9.0.x. since the latest rpms are only fedora, is bacula 9 considered
>> stable/production ready?
> You will need to talk to RedHat
Hello,
See below ...
On 04/02/2018 08:52 PM, dhofmeister wrote:
while my question is specifically related to getting *new(-ish)* bacula
installed and running on centos 7 -- i think my real question is -- why are
there no new-ish rpms for centos?
what's "out there" for centos is bacula 5.2 and
Are you setting accurate=yes only in the schedule? If so, you need to also
pass accurate=yes in the bconsole run command. Alternatively, add it to the
job definition.
To debug the client problem, try
setdebug level=100 trace=1 client=heRPI02-fd
to make it create a bacula.trace file or run the
10 matches
Mail list logo
