Re: [Bacula-users] Jobs don't remain on schedule

2017-03-31 Thread Bill Arlofski
On 03/31/2017 02:39 PM, Craig Shiroma wrote: > Hi Bill, > > Hmmm, I know I didn't touch the fileset(s) and I have IgnoreFilesetChanges set > to "yes" on these filesets. The FileSet date on one of the jobs is > "2015-10-10 18:00:12". > > Here are some configs for one of the problem jobs: > Pool { >

Re: [Bacula-users] Jobs don't remain on schedule

2017-03-31 Thread Craig Shiroma
Hi Bill, Hmmm, I know I didn't touch the fileset(s) and I have IgnoreFilesetChanges set to "yes" on these filesets. The FileSet date on one of the jobs is "2015-10-10 18:00:12". Here are some configs for one of the problem jobs: Pool { Name = server_shortname Storage = server_shortname

Re: [Bacula-users] Dell TL1000 IBM3850-HH7

2017-03-31 Thread Jim Richardson
Alan, I certainly understand what you are saying. My days of coding full time are long over. I am just a guy trying to get a good opensource community supported solution in place. Kern will certainly have more pull then I will. Kern can you give us the official line on lin_tape support? Jim

Re: [Bacula-users] Dell TL1000 IBM3850-HH7

2017-03-31 Thread Alan Brown
On 30/03/17 10:20, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello Jim, > > Thanks for the feeback. See below ... > > > On 03/30/2017 02:13 AM, Jim Richardson wrote: >> Team, >> >> I have an update on my progress. With the deadline for our new >> environment looming I started writing bash scripts to process the >> t

Re: [Bacula-users] Jobs don't remain on schedule

2017-03-31 Thread Bill Arlofski
On 03/31/2017 12:49 PM, Craig Shiroma wrote: > Hello All, > > I have a few jobs that are on the below schedule: > > Schedule { > Name = "WeeklyFullOnFriRunFirst" > Run = Level=Full fri at 17:58 > Run = Level=Incremental sat-thu at 18:00 > } > > The jobs followed the schedule until last night

[Bacula-users] Jobs don't remain on schedule

2017-03-31 Thread Craig Shiroma
Hello All, I have a few jobs that are on the below schedule: Schedule { Name = "WeeklyFullOnFriRunFirst" Run = Level=Full fri at 17:58 Run = Level=Incremental sat-thu at 18:00 } The jobs followed the schedule until last night which was a Thursday. An incremental was suppose to run, but a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 7.4.X

2017-03-31 Thread Steven Hammond
For testing, I just wanted to make sure the existing binaries would work, but I have already put in a request to purchase the newer versions. :-) Steven Hammond On 3/31/2017 7:01 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello Steven, > > You can try the 5.x binaries and they will probably work, but there >

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and GDPR - right to be forgotten

2017-03-31 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Can be implemented (though administratively a pain) by backing up each user's personal data in a different job, possibly with different pools. On 03/31/2017 11:57 AM, Waqar Khan wrote: Hi,

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 7.4.X

2017-03-31 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello Steven, You can try the 5.x binaries and they will probably work, but there have been *many* improvements since then. The community distribution no longer contains the Windows source code, so the only way to build it yourself is to get a very old one 5.2.13 (I think) and try to build it.

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and GDPR - right to be forgotten

2017-03-31 Thread Josip Deanovic
On Friday 2017-03-31 09:57:11 Waqar Khan wrote: > Hi, > > The new GDPR laws coming into effect - it is being debated whether the > "data erasure" section applies to backs up but from a technical point > of view how are you guys deleting a person's data from every backup > e.g. for the last 60 days

[Bacula-users] Bacula and GDPR - right to be forgotten

2017-03-31 Thread Waqar Khan
Hi, The new GDPR laws coming into effect - it is being debated whether the "data erasure" section applies to backs up but from a technical point of view how are you guys deleting a person's data from every backup e.g. for the last 60 days. Does anyone have an opinion on whether this law effects