On 06/08/2015 02:52 PM, Denis Witt wrote:
> Database is about 2.5Gb. Is there an easy way to convert my Catalog to
> use Postgres?
If you comment out RunAfterJob in BackupCatalog job def you'll get
/var/spool/bacula/bacula.sql. That should be directly loadable into
postgres bacula db unless mysql
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Am 08.06.2015 um 15:44 schrieb Alan Brown:
>>> The MySQL-Machine writes more or less constant 450KB/sec. to
>>> disk (mysql process). top shows about 20% wait and 76% idle.
> That looks like an out-of-memory condition (waits are bad news).
> Eithe
Hello Ana,
> Have you checked DNS? Which is the output for dig tux64.home.lan? It
> seems
> you have a second loopback interface defined in your system and bacula
> daemons are using this interface for listening to connections.
indeed, I've check my DNS settings and fixed/added it for my tes
On 06/08/2015 01:42 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> And we ditched tape when sony ditched lto. We decided that crates of
> dlts and boxes of ltos and a few scattered dds/dats are quite enough.
Sorry, brane fart. AIT. When sony ditched AIT. Boxes of AITs. D'uh.
--
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
On 06/08/2015 01:13 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
> On 08/06/15 15:58, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>> On 2015-06-08 05:25, Denis Witt wrote:
>>
>>> I'm using normal (7.200 RPM) HDDs. But, as pointed out in
>>> my mail, there is only one job running ("despooling Attributes") at the
>>> moment. All other jobs are
On 08/06/15 15:58, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> On 2015-06-08 05:25, Denis Witt wrote:
>
>> I'm using normal (7.200 RPM) HDDs. But, as pointed out in
>> my mail, there is only one job running ("despooling Attributes") at the
>> moment. All other jobs are still waiting for execution ("waiting on
>> max s
On 2015-06-08 05:25, Denis Witt wrote:
> I'm using normal (7.200 RPM) HDDs. But, as pointed out in
> my mail, there is only one job running ("despooling Attributes") at the
> moment. All other jobs are still waiting for execution ("waiting on
> max storage jobs").
Did you see my "Fixed: Re: concu
Hello Olaf,
Have you checked DNS? Which is the output for dig tux64.home.lan? It seems
you have a second loopback interface defined in your system and bacula
daemons are using this interface for listening to connections.
Best regards,
Ana
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Heitor Faria wrote:
> >
On 2015-06-08 03:25 AM, Denis Witt wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 11:10:11 +0100
> Alan Brown wrote:
>
>> What are you using for spool disk?
>
>> If it's not fast SSD then you can't run more than a couple of
>> simultaneous backups (you are seek
Hi Team,
Bacula backup successful on windows 2008 with VSS enabled.
windows 2003 client backup failed with VSS enabled.
Is VSS support on windows 2003?
Thank you,
Ankush
From: More, Ankush
Sent: 08 June 2015 17:07
To: 'bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: Windows client VSS
Hi Team,
H
On 08/06/15 11:25, Denis Witt wrote:
> On the SD there are about no IO-Operations. iotop shows some 100KB
> once in a while. CPU is 100% idle, same on the Director.
OK, I missed you were despooling attributes.
> The MySQL-Machine writes more or less constant 450KB/sec. to disk
> (mysql process).
Hello Denis,
Here you may find the solution to the concurrency and database performance
eventual issues: http://www.bacula.com.br/tuning?lang=en
Regards,
===
Heitor Medrado de Faria - LPIC-III | ITIL-F | Bacula Systems Cert
Hi Team,
Hi Team,
We are running Bacula server(7.0.5) on RHEL 6.x.
If I disable VSS then Windows client get backup and if I enable VSS (default is
enable) backup failed.
I need backup with VSS enable.
Is Bacula support all windows version with VSS enable?
Thank you,
Ankush
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 08 Jun 2015 11:10:11 +0100
Alan Brown wrote:
> What are you using for spool disk?
> If it's not fast SSD then you can't run more than a couple of
> simultaneous backups (you are seek limited with mechanical drives)
Hi Alan,
I'm using nor
On 08/06/15 10:39, Denis Witt wrote:
> Not only that I wasn't able, yet, to get multiple FDs writing Spool-Data
> at the same time, my Backup take several hours longer than before, as
> Attribute Spooling is very slow.
What are you using for spool disk?
If it's not fast SSD then you can't run mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi List,
recently I turned on "Spool Data" as I was hoping to speed up my
Backups using Concurrent Jobs and be nice to my tapes (shoe shinning).
Not only that I wasn't able, yet, to get multiple FDs writing Spool-Data
at the same time, my Backup take
16 matches
Mail list logo
