Re: [Bacula-users] NFS mount back ups?

2015-05-08 Thread Romer Ventura
Well, I did a full restore and tested random files and everything works fine. It was the software compression.. ha.. Thanks for all the help everyone. From: Luc Van der Veken [mailto:luc...@wimionline.com] Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 9:31 AM To: 'bacula-users' Subject: Re: [Bacula-users]

Re: [Bacula-users] client/server passwords

2015-05-08 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 05/08/2015 11:06 AM, Alex Domoradov wrote: >> En/decrypting .7TB stream you'll notice very much. > Do you mean 700 Gb? (653.04 GB) 653.04/1024=0.64. So I rounded the wrong way up. > it's a requirements from our security department. All communications > between servers on the Internet should be

Re: [Bacula-users] client/server passwords

2015-05-08 Thread Alex Domoradov
> En/decrypting .7TB stream you'll notice very much. Do you mean 700 Gb? (653.04 GB) > If your data isn't that sensitive, you're just wasting time. it's a requirements from our security department. All communications between servers on the Internet should be encrypted. Is there any point to test

Re: [Bacula-users] client/server passwords

2015-05-08 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 2015-05-08 02:32, Alex Domoradov wrote: > I made two tests yesterday. Full backup with TLS and without. > Why difference is so big ~ 1,5 hours? Is it normal with tls enabled? Yes. You have to encrypt everything on one end and decrypt on the other. Despite what tls preachers tell us, encryptio

Re: [Bacula-users] managing offsite tapes - How do *you* do it?

2015-05-08 Thread Josh Fisher
On 5/7/2015 5:05 PM, Robert A Threet wrote: > On my old Netbackup system, I had enough time to run a full backup on > Saturday, then I'd run a full backup on Sunday which I would use for all the > incrementals & restores during the week. The Saturday tapes would be pulled > Monday & sent offs

Re: [Bacula-users] NFS mount back ups?

2015-05-08 Thread Luc Van der Veken
Romer Ventura said: > I cant omit the fstype = nfs, as bacula will fail since bacula checks for > that. [Based on version 5.x] I think bacula will check the file system type _only_ if you specify it, and default to “everything” when you omit it. You can’t even use it for Windows clients. I don’

Re: [Bacula-users] NFS mount back ups?

2015-05-08 Thread Romer Ventura
Oooohh….. I just noticed… Software compression is 85.8%... That might be why… But I don’t get why the ration is so high… From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:k...@sibbald.com] Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 1:28 AM To: Romer Ventura Cc: 'bacula-users' Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] NFS mount back ups? The

Re: [Bacula-users] NFS mount back ups?

2015-05-08 Thread Romer Ventura
Yeah, I actually thought about that. So I did an estimate and it came up with: 2000 OK estimate files=49,851 bytes=23,481,423,809 Didn’t do a estimate listing till you mentioned it, here it is: 2000 OK estimate files=49,851 bytes=23,481,423,809 I cant omit the fstype = nfs, as bacula w

Re: [Bacula-users] client/server passwords

2015-05-08 Thread Alex Domoradov
I made two tests yesterday. Full backup with TLS and without. No TLS Compression: LZO Time: 07:56:38 Size: 653.04 GB Files: 11,288,747 Speed: 23.38 MB/s Compression: 0.21 TLS Compression: LZO Time: 09:31:08 Size: 653.04 GB Files: 11,288,747 Speed: 19.51 MB/s Compression: 0.21 Why difference is s