> On Mar 4, 2015, at 2:35 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> I have an idea, and have not tried it yet. Have you done this before?
> Suggestions? Ideas?
>
> I backup to disk, then copy to tape. The issue is how to schedule that Copy
> To Tape. The timing
> of the Copy To Tape jobs is critical t
Thanks everyone, sounds like it's going to work fine.
Now I just need to find out if we can also use the T1D drives we're
considering..
/tony
+--
|This was sent by tony.alb...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to
tonyalbers wrote (2015/03/05):
> Thanks Davide, that's excellent news.
>
> If anyone else has got anything to add, please do.
Hello, almost nothing. I have five-modules SL-150 with one LTO-5
and one LTO-6 over SAS and under FreeBSD and without any problem.
Just I have bought it when it was very
So far, any library or single tape device I've ever thrown at Bacula on
RHEL/Fedora does work. As long as it's recognized by the system as a tape
device/library it is supported by Bacula.
I've tested SCSI, USB, iSCSI, SAS units in various DAT/LTO combinations.
USB devices have always been single t
Hi Tony,
> Has anyone got any experience using bacula with the Storagetek SL-3000?
> Or the SL-150 for that matter (they should behave the same way for what
> I'm told)
>
> I'm looking for real-life experience here, not something like "if it can
> be managed with mtx, then it _should_ work.."
I
Thanks Davide, that's excellent news.
If anyone else has got anything to add, please do.
/tony
+--
|This was sent by tony.alb...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--
I've used Bacula with an SL-150 with six LTO6 drives, connected via fiber
channel: it works like a charm.
Generally speaking: every latest (at least ~5 years) sas/fc autloader works
without any problem.
Regards
- Messaggio originale -
> Da: "tonyalbers"
> A: bacula-users@lists.source
