Hi,
I had a major crash that destroyed my bacula database, and my bootstrap
file. The only thing I have to start recovering from are my bacula
tapes.
I tried to scan them all with a bscan.bsr file which looks like:
Volume="KF3969L3"
MediaType="LTO-3"
Slot=1
Volume="ATT477L3"
MediaType="LTO-3
I'm looking for feedback on a scheme dynamic filesets.
We backup to LTO4, with a schedule where each fileset gets a full every
2 months, a differential weekly, and incrementals nightly. I'm willing
to change the differential backup to monthly (alternating with Fulls).
-The Problem-
As our data vo
> Also, do I not define the Pool spec in the Job?
The Pool directive is always need by the Job resource. However it's just the
default for ad hoc job running, since schedule Pool definition will override it.
Regards,
Heitor Medrado de
Also, do I not define the Pool spec in the Job?
-Original Message-
From: Heitor Faria [mailto:hei...@bacula.com.br]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 2:54 PM
To: Polcari, Joe (Contractor)
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Disk Based Scheduling question
> Th
Ahh! Let me configure that and think about it. It may be what I need.
-Original Message-
From: Heitor Faria [mailto:hei...@bacula.com.br]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 2:54 PM
To: Polcari, Joe (Contractor)
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Disk Based Sch
What about the File Retention and Job Retention set in the Client. Should I not
set those?
-Original Message-
From: Heitor Faria [mailto:hei...@bacula.com.br]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 2:54 PM
To: Polcari, Joe (Contractor)
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula
> This is what I've done. I use 2 different jobs with 2 different schedules to
> 2 different pools in the same storage device, since it's the same client.
> On the 1st of every month I do a full.
> On the 2-31 days I do an incremental, but the backup on the 2nd is also a
> full because it's the fir
This is what I've done. I use 2 different jobs with 2 different schedules to 2
different pools in the same storage device, since it's the same client.
On the 1st of every month I do a full.
On the 2-31 days I do an incremental, but the backup on the 2nd is also a full
because it's the first.
I gu
> I have a requirement to keep 6 monthly full backups and a month of
> incrementals of the same fileset, a directory containing local daily
> mysqlbackups of the last 2 days.
> Do I need to use 2 different jobs with different schedules to do this?
> If so, how do I stop the full from running on th
I have a requirement to keep 6 monthly full backups and a month of incrementals
of the same fileset, a directory containing local daily mysqlbackups of the
last 2 days.
Do I need to use 2 different jobs with different schedules to do this?
If so, how do I stop the full from running on the same da
For us,
even InnoDB was way to slow. It took hours to insert attributes.
We switched to PostgreSQL three years ago. Since then, no more performance
problems.
Also, creating the tree for restores was magnitudes faster with PostgreSQL.
It heavily depends on the number of files and attributes in t
On 12/22/14 11:01, Josh Fisher wrote:
> MyISAM "can" be quick at inserting records at the end of a table, but
> has both table locking and a single key buffer lock causing contention,
> so is much, much slower at inserts that are not at the end of a table.
> MyISAM also does not have a change buffe
On 12/21/2014 11:17 AM, D S wrote:
Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula MySQL Agressive Tuning
Hello,
just to add one more related question/problem to this thread:
- using MySQL/MyISAM
- about 15M files from several clients
- 2.5-3M files per client
- the problem: the Dir inserting Attributes action
13 matches
Mail list logo
