Hi Will,
Can you take a look at this: http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=2034
Maybe is the same that happened to me. Try setting MyISAM as default
storage engine in MySQL:
default_storage_engine = MyISAM
Jordi.
2014-11-15 22:56 GMT+01:00 John Drescher :
> > Thanks for the response.
> >
> > Tha
> Thanks for the response.
>
> That hdparm was run during the despooling process which is likely impacting
> those numbers. (Although I would argue that 125MB/sec should be more than
> enough to despool a 45MB file! :))
>
Its usually an IOPS issue more than a sequential write. The defaults
cause
Hey John,
Thanks for the response.
That hdparm was run during the despooling process which is likely impacting
those numbers. (Although I would argue that 125MB/sec should be more than
enough to despool a 45MB file! :))
This does seem to be a mysql issue, as switching to postgres has resolved
t
Hi Mike,
Despite that the white paper tell us about having "Maximum Concurrent Jobs
= 1" in device configuration. I think this could make sense when using
stand alone devices in a group as you have in the white papers. When using
autochangers, it is much better you use the "Maximum Concurrent Jobs
On 11/14/2014 6:17 PM, Brady, Mike wrote:
> First of all thanks to Kern and Bacula Systems for making the "Best
> Practices for Disk Based Backup" and "Disk Back Design" documents
> available.
>
> I have been playing around with the best way for doing concurrent
> backups for a while and these docu
> # hdparm -tT /dev/md3
>
> /dev/md3:
> Timing cached reads: 1724 MB in 2.00 seconds = 862.23 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads: 376 MB in 3.01 seconds = 125.06 MB/sec
>
These are both very slow for a modern PC. The top number measures
cache/ram speed I would expect this number 2000 to 500
On 2014-11-15 20:45, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Unfortunately, I no longer have the time to help people debug usage
> problems, which I actually enjoy doing, but the other users on this
> Bacula email list should be able to help you resolve this. I do have a
> few remarks:
>
Thanks for taking the time
