readbytes was added in the scripts:
update_xxx_tables_10_to_11
where xxx is either postgresql, mysql, or sqlite depending
on your database.
Best regards,
Kern
On 10/14/2013 04:54 PM, kkuznetsov wrote:
> That's all i have got in this version of bacula. Search din't give me anymore.
> Anyway, is
Hello,
On 10/11/2013 06:09 PM, Ana EmÃlia M. Arruda wrote:
Hi,
We have a SAN environment with disk arrays, tape library and hosts. To
have a LAN-less backup using Bacula, do we need to buy the necessary
plugins from Enterprise Systems?
If you want to have two separate storage daemons share t
> I have a separate set of clients that I am adding to my bacula server. I
> would like to keep a separate catalog. My postgresql server is running on my
> bacula server. What is the recommendation for standing up a separate catalog
> in this scenario? Do I need a separate instance of the po
I have a separate set of clients that I am adding to my bacula server. I would
like to keep a separate catalog. My postgresql server is running on my bacula
server. What is the recommendation for standing up a separate catalog in this
scenario? Do I need a separate instance of the postgresql
> That's all i have got in this version of bacula.
I think you can get them from here:
http://www.bacula.org/git/cgit.cgi/bacula/tree/bacula/updatedb
>Search din't give me anymore.
> Anyway, is there anything like "readbytes" in those scripts you mentioned?
I do not know.
John
I am searching for a way of making my copy jobs stick around for a
longer period of time then the original jobs.
Intended goal, original jobs are backups to file system, copy jobs go to
tape and are taken offsite. I intend to keep the file backups for a
couple of months for fast restores of ac
That's all i have got in this version of bacula. Search din't give me anymore.
Anyway, is there anything like "readbytes" in those scripts you mentioned?
+--
|This was sent by kkuznet...@web.1tv.ru via Backup Central.
|Forward SPA
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 3:40 AM, kkuznetsov
wrote:
> Pretty close, but not. Found this /etc/alternatives/update_bacula_tables
> which then launches /usr/libexec/bacula/update_postgresql_tables
>
That is not the correct update script.
Here is what I have for update scripts:
/usr/libexec/bacula/
> On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 18:25:07 -0700, David Newman said:
>
> On 10/9/13 4:41 PM, David Newman wrote:
> > FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE, bacula-client-5.2.12_3 installed from ports
> >
> > Ever since upgrading this host to FreeBSD 9.2, bacula-fd crashes as soon
> > as bacula-dir starts a backup job. The
Pretty close, but not. Found this /etc/alternatives/update_bacula_tables which
then launches /usr/libexec/bacula/update_postgresql_tables
here is a code:
#!/bin/sh
#
# Shell script to update PostgreSQL tables from version 11 to 12
#
echo " "
echo "This script will update a Bacula PostgreSQL data
10 matches
Mail list logo