>
> I am struggling to find a method of keeping consistent off-site without
> breaking easy restores.
>
> My planned schedule was as follows:
>
> First Sunday of Month: Full Backup to Disk
> Monday-Saturday: Incremental Backup to Disk
> Friday (after the incremental): Virtual Full Backup
I am struggling to find a method of keeping consistent off-site without
breaking easy restores.
My planned schedule was as follows:
First Sunday of Month: Full Backup to Disk
Monday-Saturday: Incremental Backup to Disk
Friday (after the incremental): Virtual Full Backup to Tape
Subsequent
On 25 September 2013 21:25, Mauro wrote:
> On 25 September 2013 21:20, Mauro wrote:
>
>>
>> On 25 September 2013 18:24, Tim Krieger wrote:
>>
>>> We ran into this issue when we replaced all our iptables firewalls with
>>> Juniper SSG devices. Check the timeout values for the service you defined
I just want to make sure I understand how this is supposed to work
before I do something that might cause me to lose backups.
Suppose I take a full backup for a couple of clients to a backup pool.
Then I successfully run a copy job which copies these to an archive
pool. Am I correct in assuming th
On 25 September 2013 21:20, Mauro wrote:
>
> On 25 September 2013 18:24, Tim Krieger wrote:
>
>> We ran into this issue when we replaced all our iptables firewalls with
>> Juniper SSG devices. Check the timeout values for the service you defined
>> on your juniper for your bacula ports, the jun
On 25 September 2013 18:24, Tim Krieger wrote:
> We ran into this issue when we replaced all our iptables firewalls with
> Juniper SSG devices. Check the timeout values for the service you defined
> on your juniper for your bacula ports, the juniper will have a default
> session time, we found t
We ran into this issue when we replaced all our iptables firewalls with Juniper
SSG devices. Check the timeout values for the service you defined on your
juniper for your bacula ports, the juniper will have a default session time, we
found the juniper closes the connection often, and ended up h
I have several tape drives that indicate they are being used by jobs that have
been long terminated. Without stopping/restarting bacula, is there a command
that might get the storage daemon to recognize that the drives can be used for
other jobs? The commands used so far:
status storage=mychan
Deepak-
I am removing all of the thread as it is becoming messy and useless.
Second, Radosław is trying to tell you that your udev rules are incorrect
for the tape drive references and that your tape changer needs a udev rule
to keep it persistent, too. You can use the persistent names provided b
On 2013-09-24 20:24, compdoc wrote:
> I appreciate legacy hardware, but I'm a small business with newer x86_64
> hardware as are all of my customers who use mysql, so not really a concern.
What business is that, spamming the net with oracle pr like we aren't
getting enough of it from oracle alre
Hi Guys,
I want single email for all my successful jobs for a complete day and
separate email for all operator issues for which admin intervention is
needed and for error messages.
Please tell me how can I do that ?
I am getting separate mails for all completed jobs as well as for all
erro
On 09/24/13 21:24, compdoc wrote:
>> The question that has to be asked, though, is "under what test
> conditions".
>
> Well, I have to assume the tests mean on the same hardware. Which implies
> changes in code.
The problem is that doesn't mean a lot of the test is on hardware on
which the olde
From: Mauro mailto:mrsan...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 8:18 AM
To: Uwe Schuerkamp
mailto:uwe.schuerk...@nionex.net>>, Mauro
mailto:mrsan...@gmail.com>>, bacula-users
mailto:bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] fatal error on full backup.
On 25 S
Quoting Radosław Korzeniewski :
> Hello,
>
> 2013/9/25 Deepak :
>>>
>>> Well, a "second" autochanger device? :) I bet you misconfigured your
>>> tape library. In most cases it is not the problem.
>>
>>
>> I hope it is showing like that because My blade server has two hba cards
> and
>> I have done
On 25 September 2013 13:58, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:01:41PM +0200, Mauro wrote:
>
> > Start time: 25-Sep-2013 10:55:01
> > End time: 25-Sep-2013 12:55:26
>
> This looks suspiciously close to 7200 seconds which is the default
> tcp_keepaliv
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:01:41PM +0200, Mauro wrote:
> Start time: 25-Sep-2013 10:55:01
> End time: 25-Sep-2013 12:55:26
This looks suspiciously close to 7200 seconds which is the default
tcp_keepalive_timeout for most Linux distros.
Have you tried using the bac
Hello,
2013/9/25 Deepak :
>>
>> Well, a "second" autochanger device? :) I bet you misconfigured your
>> tape library. In most cases it is not the problem.
>
>
> I hope it is showing like that because My blade server has two hba cards
and
> I have done zonning of tape for both of them.
OK.
>
>>
>
Hello.
I'm doing a backup of a single host.
Data is about 57G.
Bacula server is 5.2.6 in a debian linux system with 8G of ram.
Database is postgresql on the same server.
Job seems ending normally:
status client=svsostream01-fd
Connecting to Client svsostream01-fd at 192.168.240.10:9102
svsostream
Hello,
2013/9/25 BOURGAULT Antoine :
> Since a week, I'm testing backup on a powerful server (32G RAM / 4 CPU).
>
> I do a full backup on weekends and incremental every day of the week.
> Why my dedup rate is so low?
>
You need to use aligned volumes for that.
best regards
--
Radosław Korzeniew
Quoting Radosław Korzeniewski :
> Hello,
>
> 2013/9/24 Deepak :
>> Quoting Radosław Korzeniewski :
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> 2013/9/24 Deepak :
I have removed lin_tape driver permanently loaded st driver and rebooted
system . now it is showing st devices as my st devices.
Since a week, I'm testing backup on a powerful server (32G RAM / 4 CPU).
I do a full backup on weekends and incremental every day of the week.
Why my dedup rate is so low?
[root@Bacula fs01]# zdb -DD bacula
DDT-sha256-zap-unique: 17612028 entries, size 295 on disk, 154 in core
DDT histogr
21 matches
Mail list logo
