Re: [Bacula-users] backup to multiple disks

2013-05-23 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, 2013/5/24 Dimitri Maziuk > On 05/10/2013 07:31 AM, John Drescher wrote: > >> I am a bit surprised that no one mentioned Bacula's built-in virtual > >> autochanger feature that has been there for years. The syntax for > >> enabling it is a bit of a "kludge" in my opinion, but it is the w

Re: [Bacula-users] backup to multiple disks

2013-05-23 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello Kern, 2013/5/10 Kern Sibbald > > I am a bit surprised that no one mentioned Bacula's built-in virtual > autochanger feature that has been there for years. The syntax for > enabling it is a bit of a "kludge" in my opinion, but it is the way > that Bacula > Systems is recommending to handl

Re: [Bacula-users] backup to multiple disks

2013-05-23 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 05/10/2013 07:31 AM, John Drescher wrote: >> I am a bit surprised that no one mentioned Bacula's built-in virtual >> autochanger feature that has been there for years. The syntax for >> enabling it is a bit of a "kludge" in my opinion, but it is the way that >> Bacula >> Systems is recommendin

Re: [Bacula-users] Fileset inclusion list question

2013-05-23 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 05/23/2013 02:43 PM, Ana Emília Machado de Arruda wrote: > Yes, I would prefer to have a long list of "/usr". "/etc", "/var", etc. > And have "onefs = yes". This way avoids a lot of trouble, including > "infinite loop recursing filesystems", like states in manual... Uhmm... and how much time do

Re: [Bacula-users] Fileset inclusion list question

2013-05-23 Thread Ana Emília Machado de Arruda
Yes, I would prefer to have a long list of "/usr". "/etc", "/var", etc. And have "onefs = yes". This way avoids a lot of trouble, including "infinite loop recursing filesystems", like states in manual... If you have onefs set to no, you have to be very carefull about excluding directories to avoid

Re: [Bacula-users] Fileset inclusion list question

2013-05-23 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
> On 05/23/2013 12:00 PM, Jonathan Bayer wrote: >> That probably would, I'll have to read it. > > "File = /" will not back up /usr *if* / and /usr are separate filesystems. I should've spelled out "and 'onefs = yes', which is the default". The point being, unless you already have every subdirect

Re: [Bacula-users] Fileset inclusion list question

2013-05-23 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, 2013/5/23 Dimitri Maziuk > On 05/23/2013 12:00 PM, Jonathan Bayer wrote: > > That probably would, I'll have to read it. > > "File = /" will not back up /usr *if* / and /usr are separate filesystems. > > With "onefs=no" option (as Ana suggested) it (File=/) will backup "/usr" when "/" and

Re: [Bacula-users] Fileset inclusion list question

2013-05-23 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 05/23/2013 12:00 PM, Jonathan Bayer wrote: > That probably would, I'll have to read it. "File = /" will not back up /usr *if* / and /usr are separate filesystems. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [Bacula-users] Fileset inclusion list question

2013-05-23 Thread Jonathan Bayer
That probably would, I'll have to read it. Thanks JBB On 5/23/13 12:53 PM, Ana Emília Machado de Arruda wrote: Have you tried configuring onefs = no? "If you wish to backup multiple filesystems, you can explicitly list each filesystem you want saved. Otherwise, if you set the onefs option

Re: [Bacula-users] Fileset inclusion list question

2013-05-23 Thread Ana Emília Machado de Arruda
Have you tried configuring onefs = no? "If you wish to backup multiple filesystems, you can explicitly list each filesystem you want saved. Otherwise, if you set the onefs option to *no*, Bacula will backup all mounted file systems (i.e. traverse mount points) that are found within the *FileSet*."

Re: [Bacula-users] Fileset inclusion list question

2013-05-23 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 2013-05-23 08:30, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote: > Hello, > > 2013/5/23 Jonathan Bayer > > > Ok. So this is either a "feature" or a "bug" depending on your > point of view :-) > > > In my point of view it is not a "bug" nor a "feature". User wants to > co

Re: [Bacula-users] Director not open port 9101

2013-05-23 Thread Michaël Nourry
Le 23/05/2013 15:37, stepanoff a écrit : ps axf | grep bacula 1637 ?? Is 0:00,00 /usr/local/sbin/bacula-sd -u bacula -g bacula -v -c /usr/local/etc/bacula-sd.conf 1640 ?? Is 0:00,00 /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -v -c /usr/local/etc/bacula-fd.conf 1643 ?? Is 0:00,02 /usr/l

[Bacula-users] Director not open port 9101

2013-05-23 Thread stepanoff
ps axf | grep bacula 1637 ?? Is 0:00,00 /usr/local/sbin/bacula-sd -u bacula -g bacula -v -c /usr/local/etc/bacula-sd.conf 1640 ?? Is 0:00,00 /usr/local/sbin/bacula-fd -u root -g wheel -v -c /usr/local/etc/bacula-fd.conf 1643 ?? Is 0:00,02 /usr/local/sbin/bacula-dir -u bacula -g bacula -v

Re: [Bacula-users] Fileset inclusion list question

2013-05-23 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, 2013/5/23 Jonathan Bayer > Ok. So this is either a "feature" or a "bug" depending on your point of > view :-) > > In my point of view it is not a "bug" nor a "feature". User wants to copy recursive all files from "/" and from "/usr" filesystems, so any available utility will copy some f

Re: [Bacula-users] Having a problem getting readfifo to work

2013-05-23 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, 2013/5/23 Jonathan Bayer > Hmmm. > > Ok, I've been doing more research, and think I have figured it out. > > I've been looking in the restore section, trying to see the amount of data > which was backed up, but it always said 0 for the fifo. > The metadata (i.e. file size) of the file w

Re: [Bacula-users] Fileset inclusion list question

2013-05-23 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, 2013/5/22 Jonathan Bayer > I remember that a while ago, if a directory was included 2 times (such > as the following): > > Include { >File = / >File = /usr > } > > and /usr was on the same filesystem, it would be backed up two times. > Is this still the case? > > I think yes. You