On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 22:08:13 +0200
"Erik P. Olsen" wrote:
> I have come to the conclusion that I must downgrade bacula 5.2.12 to version
> 5.0.3 which I have run successfully for quite some time. The reason is that I
> installed version 5.2.12 that comes with fedora 18. It works beautifully on
I guesa I can try that. After all, the incomplete jobs is a problem I got rid
of, and I suspect (hopefully) it won't happen again. Thanks all! :)
LDC - Gustavo El Khoury
On 13/04/2013, at 02:26 p.m., Adrian Reyer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:45:50PM -0430, LDC - Gustavo El Khoury wrote:
I think that error may not be related to the version, but to something else.
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bacula-users&max_rows=50&style=nested&viewmonth=201008
Take a look at the post and look for the error code 1067 with Ctrl-F. Try to
run bacula-fd from an administr
> I have come to the conclusion that I must downgrade bacula 5.2.12 to
version
>5.0.3 which I have run successfully for quite some time.
I use 5.2.12 Director to backup Windows 7 Pro clients using the 64 bit
5.2.10 client, although I'm sure the 32 bit version works well too:
http://sourceforge.n
I have come to the conclusion that I must downgrade bacula 5.2.12 to version
5.0.3 which I have run successfully for quite some time. The reason is that I
installed version 5.2.12 that comes with fedora 18. It works beautifully on my
linux systems but I can't backup my windows 7 client. The bacu
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 12:45:50PM -0430, LDC - Gustavo El Khoury wrote:
> That's not really an option... The other day I purged the tape where the
> incomplete job was, with purge jobs volume, and I lost an incremental backup
> I had, that was stored in that tape. Your suggestion will only work
On 04/13/13 13:15, LDC - Gustavo El Khoury wrote:
> That's not really an option... The other day I purged the tape where the
> incomplete job was, with purge jobs volume, and I lost an incremental backup
> I had, that was stored in that tape. Your suggestion will only work if the
> given tape wo
That's not really an option... The other day I purged the tape where the
incomplete job was, with purge jobs volume, and I lost an incremental backup I
had, that was stored in that tape. Your suggestion will only work if the given
tape would ONLY contain the incomplete backup, which is hardly th
On 04/12/13 22:44, LDC - Gustavo El Khoury wrote:
> If what you're saying is correct (which seems the case, sadly) let's propose
> a weird, bit degenerated but still useful case: retention period of one
> month, and a series of failed backups, which fail after writing a lot of data
> into tapes.
