On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 05:18:37PM -0400, Mingus Dew wrote:
> Dear All,
> I am running bacula-5.2.10 on Solaris 10 x86. I've noticed an
> issue recently where I've wanted to restrict further restrict the
> Maximum Volumes in a couple of Pools.
> I edited the config and changed "Maximum Volumes
Dear John,
Thanks for the quick response.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:26 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Mingus Dew wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> I am running bacula-5.2.10 on Solaris 10 x86. I've noticed an
>> issue recently where I've wanted to restrict further res
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:27 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> Cancel that. I see you said you did that. Do you have more than 3
> volumes already?
I see that you do. I do not think that reducing a pool containing more
volumes than the new max will have any effect until you manually
remove volumes.
Joh
Cancel that. I see you said you did that. Do you have more than 3
volumes already?
John
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Mingus Dew wrote:
> Dear All,
> I am running bacula-5.2.10 on Solaris 10 x86. I've noticed an
> issue recently where I've wanted to restrict further restrict the
> Maximum Volumes in a couple of Pools.
> I edited the config and changed "Maximum Volumes = 3". I
Dear All,
I am running bacula-5.2.10 on Solaris 10 x86. I've noticed an
issue recently where I've wanted to restrict further restrict the
Maximum Volumes in a couple of Pools.
I edited the config and changed "Maximum Volumes = 3". I then reloaded
and updated the Pools from Resource. It says it
I use bacula to backup Hyper-V slices. I have no errors.
Mike
On Mar 20, 2013, at 13:44, "Bachmatiuk, Marcin"
wrote:
> Hello,
> I have question.
> Does anyone have an experiment one of the bacula backup and Hyper-V?
>
> Any solution.a
>
> --
> I've readn an example in the documentation as follows:
>
>
> RunBeforeJob = "/home/kern/bacula/bin/make_catalog_backup"
> RunAfterJob = "/home/kern/bacula/bin/delete_catalog_backup"
>
> I don't understand it performs a backup and then deletes it? Am I
> missing something?
>
This dumps a te
Am 20.03.2013 20:28, schrieb Sergio Belkin:
> Hi,
>
> I've readn an example in the documentation as follows:
>
>
> RunBeforeJob = "/home/kern/bacula/bin/make_catalog_backup"
> RunAfterJob = "/home/kern/bacula/bin/delete_catalog_backup"
>
> I don't understand it performs a backup and then
On 03/20/13 15:28, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've readn an example in the documentation as follows:
>
>
> RunBeforeJob = "/home/kern/bacula/bin/make_catalog_backup"
> RunAfterJob = "/home/kern/bacula/bin/delete_catalog_backup"
>
> I don't understand it performs a backup and then dele
No, the bacula.log is empty, nor have I seen messages like the one you
describe. However, I do see this often in all the emails I get of completed
jobs:
19-Mar 08:02 bacula-dir JobId 1558: Begin pruning Jobs older than 42 years 6
months 3 days 13 hours 2 mins 27 secs.
19-Mar 08:02 bacula-dir J
Hi,
I've readn an example in the documentation as follows:
RunBeforeJob = "/home/kern/bacula/bin/make_catalog_backup"
RunAfterJob = "/home/kern/bacula/bin/delete_catalog_backup"
I don't understand it performs a backup and then deletes it? Am I
missing something?
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Hello,
I have question.
Does anyone have an experiment one of the bacula backup and Hyper-V?
Any solution.a
---
Best regards Marcin
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So
Hello,
2013/3/20 Nasos Nikologiannis
> During Bacula clean installation, upon tables creation, I get the
> following notices from PostgreSQL.
>
> Since Bacula will be installed on a production system, and PostgreSQL is
> prefered over MySQL, I would like to
>
> ask if these notices are considere
On 03/20/13 13:33, Novosielski, Ryan wrote:
> On 03/20/2013 11:34 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> tl;dr version: A Differential backup is always based off the most
>> recent completed successful Full backup of that Job at the time the
>> Differential was started (or possibly at the time it was schedu
> A related question for anyone reading -- if I delete, say, the last
> two daily incremental backups and run a new one... would that
> incremental now pick up all of the files that were in those two plus
> whatever's changed since?
I believe it does that. However I have not tested this in some ti
During Bacula clean installation, upon tables creation, I get the following
notices from PostgreSQL.
Since Bacula will be installed on a production system, and PostgreSQL is
prefered over MySQL, I would like to
ask if these notices are considered "safe".
The server is running on CentOS 6.4, Bacu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/20/2013 11:34 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 03/18/13 11:17, Melvin Ross wrote:
>> As the title says, I want to know if within a JobID, does bacula
>> possess any logic verification when selecting which full back up
>> to base incremental/differ
Hello,
2013/3/20 dweimer
> OK, so I thought, hey why not setup an automated scheduled task to
> delete the orphaned file and path entries, seemed like a good idea at
> first. I have a fairly short retention period set, and as a result
> generates about 300,000 orphaned file name records and abo
On 03/20/2013 16:50, dweimer wrote:
> OK, so I thought, hey why not setup an automated scheduled task to
> delete the orphaned file and path entries, seemed like a good idea at
> first. I have a fairly short retention period set, and as a result
> generates about 300,000 orphaned file name records
OK, so I thought, hey why not setup an automated scheduled task to
delete the orphaned file and path entries, seemed like a good idea at
first. I have a fairly short retention period set, and as a result
generates about 300,000 orphaned file name records and about 75,000
orphaned path entries
On 03/18/13 11:17, Melvin Ross wrote:
> As the title says, I want to know if within a JobID, does bacula possess
> any logic verification when selecting which full back up to base
> incremental/differential back ups on or does it simply uses the latest
> one. The reason for this question is due
On 3/18/2013 5:44 PM, Jean-Gabriel Duquesnoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have now as far as I can see, managed to correctly configure Bacula
> to backup my Windows7 32Bits PC from the Linux Server. But still
> something is wrong which causes the backup to fail.
> This is what can be found in the log:
> 18-
On 15/03/2013 17:42, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:02:52 +0100
> Julien Cochennec wrote:
>
> [...]
>>> Thanks a lot for your help. I added user and group and changed
>>> ownership of /var/lib/bacula files and it works again (see below).
>>> Is foreground the -f option? If so
On 3/18/2013 6:31 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Like others, I have been having problems with random backup failures due
> to network IO errors. See this thread for another example:
>
> http://bacula.10910.n7.nabble.com/Win32-FD-Write-error-sending-N-bytes-to-Storage-daemon-td35109.html
>
> I underst
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 02:35:48PM +, Jonathan Horne wrote:
> This problem continues.
>
> I have 1 bacula server that pauses during full backup jobs:
>
> Running Jobs:
> Console connected at 19-Mar-13 07:47
> JobId Level Name Status
> ==
26 matches
Mail list logo
