Re: [Bacula-users] Reporting on previous jobs

On 01/16/13 14:33, Jack Cobb wrote: > We are using Bacula 5.0.3 on an Ubuntu 10.04 server using MySQL as the > database engine. We review each day’s backup to verify it completed but now > our auditors are asking for a report that shows the backup job results for the > previous twelve months...whi

Re: [Bacula-users] A Bacula ebook

Thank You! I'll definitel try this :) Regards, Bálint 2013/1/16 Kern Sibbald > Hello, > > If you need additional Bacula How-to information you may be interested in > the > new Bacula ebook that has been released at the following link: > > http://www.packtpub.com/network-backup-with-bacula/boo

[Bacula-users] Reporting on previous jobs

We are using Bacula 5.0.3 on an Ubuntu 10.04 server using MySQL as the database engine. We review each day's backup to verify it completed but now our auditors are asking for a report that shows the backup job results for the previous twelve months...which is the amount of time we keep our backup

Re: [Bacula-users] db "bacula" owner "postgres". correct?

On 2013-01-16 12:34, Dan Langille wrote: > On 2013-01-16 11:38, Sven Gehr wrote: >> hi@all, >> >> is it correct that the postgres user owns the database bacula? >> >> >> >> postgres=# \l+ >> >> List of databases >> Name| Owner | Encoding | Collate |Ctype| >> Access privilege

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon and Director version matching

On 16.01.2013 18:58, compdoc wrote: > In the docs it states: "the Director and Storage daemon must always be on > the same minor release number" > > So is it ok to run a remote 5.2.5 Storage daemon with a version 5.2.12 > Director on the server? > > major.minor.release Hi. Officially, don't try t

[Bacula-users] A Bacula ebook

Hello, If you need additional Bacula How-to information you may be interested in the new Bacula ebook that has been released at the following link: http://www.packtpub.com/network-backup-with-bacula/book

Re: [Bacula-users] db "bacula" owner "postgres". correct?

On 2013-01-16 11:38, Sven Gehr wrote: > hi@all, > > is it correct that the postgres user owns the database bacula? > > > > postgres=# \l+ > > List of databases > Name| Owner | Encoding | Collate |Ctype| > Access privileges | Size | Tablespace | > Descrip

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon and Director version matching

On 2013-01-16 11:58, compdoc wrote: > In the docs it states: "the Director and Storage daemon must always > be on > the same minor release number" > > So is it ok to run a remote 5.2.5 Storage daemon with a version > 5.2.12 > Director on the server? I accidentally ran something similar to that r

Re: [Bacula-users] estimate query

On 2013-01-16 12:44, Jonathan Horne wrote: > Is there a way to make a query that will pull estimate from all > clients? Shell script it. CLIENTS="A B" etc... echo 'estimate ...' | bconsole Does that help? You could also script the list of clients. > This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not

Re: [Bacula-users] GZIP not supported on this Client

2013/1/15 Novosielski, Ryan : > Sounds to me like the client was built without the GZIP library or something > like that. That's unfortunate, but my guess is the solution is to > create/restore a backup that isn't GZIP compressed or to build a new client > that includes support. Generally, that so

[Bacula-users] estimate query

Is there a way to make a query that will pull estimate from all clients? This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e

[Bacula-users] Tray Monitor on Ubuntu 12.04

Ubuntu 12.04 has bacula 5.2.5 in its repos and it seems to work well, however the Windows binary on Sourceforge is 5.2.10 so I decided to try my hand at building bacula from the files on Sourceforge. First version 5.2.10, and then version 5.2.12. It seems to run fine (doing my first full backups

[Bacula-users] Storage daemon and Director version matching

In the docs it states: "the Director and Storage daemon must always be on the same minor release number" So is it ok to run a remote 5.2.5 Storage daemon with a version 5.2.12 Director on the server? major.minor.release --

[Bacula-users] db "bacula" owner "postgres". correct?

hi@all, is it correct that the postgres user owns the database bacula? postgres=# \l+ List of databases Name| Owner | Encoding | Collate |Ctype| Access privileges | Size | Tablespace |

Re: [Bacula-users] Client side FS detection

> One idea I can think of is using a list of filesystem types that matter. > That way you can handle most things and also exclude cluster > filesystems like ocfs2 that should best be backed up with a different > job and separate fd. This is what we do for our UNIX systems. We actually define each

Re: [Bacula-users] backing up a fedora 17

On 2013-01-16 10:40, Jonathan Horne wrote: > Today I backed up a fedora 17 for the first time. Fedora 17 does > funny > things with the file systems that I don't yet understand the concept > of what they are doing, but it looks like this: > > [jonathan@h0luvm000 ~]$ df -h > > Filesystem Size Used

Re: [Bacula-users] backing up a fedora 17

On 16 January 2013 16:40, Jonathan Horne wrote: > In actuality, there is 7GB of data on the computer. Bacula thoughfully > backs up 14GB. > > Is there a way to tell bacula to ignore the special file systems and only > backup the real file systems? > I backup Fedora systems, but only specific f

[Bacula-users] backing up a fedora 17

Today I backed up a fedora 17 for the first time. Fedora 17 does funny things with the file systems that I don't yet understand the concept of what they are doing, but it looks like this: [jonathan@h0luvm000 ~]$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on rootfs

Re: [Bacula-users] windows enterprise is not working, x32/x64.

On 16 January 2013 15:47, wrote: > > Zitat von Jean-Louis Dupond : > > > Could you check what http://artemis.dupie.be/bacula-win64-5.2.12.exe > > does? :) > > > Yes, please! Thanks, --Simone -- You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerso

Re: [Bacula-users] windows enterprise is not working, x32/x64.

Zitat von Jean-Louis Dupond : > Could you check what http://artemis.dupie.be/bacula-win64-5.2.12.exe > does? :) > Is there any chance to get a detailed description how you setup the build environment? Thanks Andreas -

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-5 Tapes full after between 30-130gb Dell PV-124T

bdoran wrote (2013/01/15): > I'm using a Bacula setup in conjunction with a Dell PV-124T which has 16 > LTO-5 tapes. The system works correctly except that the tapes become > extremely quickly. There is no consistency between the amount written to each > tape though it is generally in the range

Re: [Bacula-users] windows enterprise is not working, x32/x64.

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 02:00:31PM +0100, Jean-Louis Dupond wrote: > Could you check what http://artemis.dupie.be/bacula-win64-5.2.12.exe > does? :) > > Certainly, I've forwarded your message to my workmate who's in charge of our windows backup client environment. Thanks! Uwe > On 2013-01-1

Re: [Bacula-users] windows enterprise is not working, x32/x64.

Could you check what http://artemis.dupie.be/bacula-win64-5.2.12.exe does? :) On 2013-01-16 11:09, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:55:18AM +0100, Adrian Reyer wrote: >> >> This is why I wrote 'If I misgot this' as I have that very >> understanding >> the windows code stays wh

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape Library and Cleaning Requests?

Hi Frank, On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:30:13AM +0100, f.staed...@dafuer.de wrote: > Right now I'm able to clean the drive after the job has finished - but > is there any possibility that bacula itself handles the cleaning requests? No, bacula does not know about the needed cleaning, all you can do

[Bacula-users] Client side FS detection

Hi all, I'm aware this must be sort of an FAQ. I just failed to find good examples in my searches. What I'm looking for is how others solved listing the filesystems on a client using a client-side command that is configured on the dir. My goal is to backup everything "local" on a system, but the

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-5 Tapes full after between 30-130gb Dell PV-124T

Zitat von bdoran : > Hi, > > I'm using a Bacula setup in conjunction with a Dell PV-124T which > has 16 LTO-5 tapes. The system works correctly except that the tapes > become extremely quickly. There is no consistency between the amount > written to each tape though it is generally in the r

Re: [Bacula-users] windows enterprise is not working, x32/x64.

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:55:18AM +0100, Adrian Reyer wrote: > > This is why I wrote 'If I misgot this' as I have that very understanding > the windows code stays where it is, get patches as they are developed, > just noone of 'the community' provides precompiled binaries. Just like > noone provi

Re: [Bacula-users] windows enterprise is not working, x32/x64.

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:02:33AM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > > If I misgot this and future windows fd-development ceased to exist, the > > code about to be removed, I'd see it as a serious problem as it damages > > the credibility of bacula as an available system. > Umm, where did you get that i

[Bacula-users] Tape Library and Cleaning Requests?

Hello alltogether, just another question I stumbled upon. While doing more testing with a tape library and my rather large backup sets I came across a new question. A single full backup of one machine is about 30 TB and while a full backup is running the libraray requests drive cleaning (I called

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO5 speed

Hi, > one more thing to try is raising the readahead setting for your raid0 > device, if you haven't done that yet. If this happens to be a linux > server you could do this by echo 8192 > > /sys/block/md0/queue/readahead_kb for a software raid. If it's a > hardware raid, use the device name of tha

Re: [Bacula-users] windows enterprise is not working, x32/x64.

On 15 January 2013 17:12, Jean-Louis Dupond wrote: > I've been able to build a 64bit windows exe/dll on a Ubuntu 12.10 > system with the mingw64 from packages in Ubuntu. > Also used OpenSSL 1.0 instead of the older versions given in the build > docs for win32. > I had to change some small things