On 03.01.2013 08:19, Gary R, Schmidt wrote:
>> Does anyone know whether bacula can be made to work on a block-level
>> dedupe storage system? Are there any plans to support this
>> technology?
>
> What magic are you expecting?
If I had to guess I'd say he wants to backup de-duplicated data only
o
On 01/03/13 08:52, tonyalbers wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Does anyone know whether bacula can be made to work on a block-level dedupe
> storage system? Are there any plans to support this technology?
>
> The reason I ask is that I've gotten a few requests from people who have
> devices like Quantum
> Does anyone know whether bacula can be made to work on a block-level
> dedupe storage system? Are there any plans to support this
> technology?
What exactly do you mean by "work"?
If you mean "use as a target for disk-based storage volumes," it's just
another fscking file system, it will work
Hi everyone,
Does anyone know whether bacula can be made to work on a block-level dedupe
storage system? Are there any plans to support this technology?
The reason I ask is that I've gotten a few requests from people who have
devices like Quantum DXi's or DataDomain, and these both do block-lev
Hi Jesper,
> Well, if you are sending uncompressible data, then above picture
> looks like a fully saturated LTO5-drive operating at optimal speed
> since the 140MB/s are for compressible data to the drive.
thanks for your quick answer. So the sound of the drive like starting
and stopping in abo
On 02/01/13 16:12, f.staed...@dafuer.de wrote:
> Is there anything wrong here? If I'm right about 140MB/s for an
> LTO5 are quite ok since the data cannot be compressed.
Well, if you are sending uncompressible data, then above picture
looks like a fully saturated LTO5-drive operating at optimal
Hello,
maybe a beginners question from me. I setup bacula and I'm very
impressed about it. I have a LTO-5 drive and use data spooling to a
6x1TB RAID0 array before streaming to disk. But thoughput is maybe low.
The drive writes while reading at 140MB from disk for 7-8 seconds, stops
for 4-5 se
On Jan 02, 2013, at 04:49 AM, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote:So far, what I came up with is creating a second job (a verify job) for every client in my Bacula Director and using a different schedule for those jobs, so Bacula will schedule these verify jobs to run after the daily backup jobs.That way do
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 10:23:52AM +, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>
> Dan,
>
> The main cause of my confusion is that Bacula usually just creates a new
> volume file when the current one is full or marked as (unless a volume has
> already been recycled). This is why I only get the errror elsewher
Hello list!
I'd like to start using Verify Jobs and I'd would like your opinion on how
to automatically run it daily after all normal backup jobs have finished.
So far, what I came up with is creating a second job (a verify job) for
every client in my Bacula Director and using a different schedul
On Monday 31 December 2012 15:11:43 Dan Langille wrote:
> On Dec 31, 2012, at 6:21 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> > All of my storage devices are file devices and I have generally no
> > problems unless I run out of filestore space which thankfully hasn't
> > happened for a while.
> >
> > However, on
Hi,
In case anyone has the same problem, I can now confirm that the end of tape
error is solved (no message after a real test with 2TB (~ 400,000 files) of
actual data. The restore of that same backup is successful and the sha1sum
of all files OK).
The non documented error message mentioned befor
12 matches
Mail list logo
