Re: [Bacula-users] Differential backup with old timestamps

2012-11-07 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 00:27:59 -0700, trexman said: > > Ok, here is the log output: > > 28-Okt 23:56 uxepv21-dir JobId 618: Created new Volume "Voltestjob-Diff-3722" > in catalog. > 28-Okt 23:56 uxepv21-dir JobId 618: Using Device "testjob" > 23-Okt 03:42 uxepv21-fd JobId 618: Warning: DIR

Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring the catalog database - F14 to F17

2012-11-07 Thread Simone Caronni
On 7 November 2012 17:24, John Drescher wrote: > I would restore the old database from a sql dump then run the upgrade > scripts to fix the version problem. > Exactly. What you are doing (going from a 5.0.3 director to a 5.2.11 director) is not a restore of the old server, but an upgrade. You s

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Fedora 17

2012-11-07 Thread Simone Caronni
btw, the File Daemon should have the following as the working directory in /etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf FileDaemon { WorkingDirectory = /var/spool/bacula } Regards, --Simone On 7 November 2012 17:34, Simone Caronni wrote: > Hello, > > I'm the current mantainer of Bacula in Fedora, I stepped i

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Fedora 17

2012-11-07 Thread Simone Caronni
Hello, I'm the current mantainer of Bacula in Fedora, I stepped in as a mantainer during the Fedora 15 cycle. One of the first thing I did was close all the old bugs, including the one you mention. I don't have the symptoms you describe. The log file should be created automatically; and I don't h

Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring the catalog database - F14 to F17

2012-11-07 Thread John Drescher
> By ignoring the old catalog and just creating a new installation I can get the > director working. The message does indeed refer to differences in catalog > database versions. > > However, I need to import the old catalog into the new server. Can anyone > point me in the right direction please. >

Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring the catalog database - F14 to F17

2012-11-07 Thread Gary Stainburn
By ignoring the old catalog and just creating a new installation I can get the director working. The message does indeed refer to differences in catalog database versions. However, I need to import the old catalog into the new server. Can anyone point me in the right direction please. (Sorry i

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Re: wanted on DEVICE-0, is in use by device DEVICE-1

2012-11-07 Thread Josh Fisher
On 11/6/2012 6:36 PM, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > A quick test of this scenario seems to work. > Leaving "Prefer Mounted Volumes = yes" (default). > Setting both drives in autochanger to have 1/2 of the the total > concurrently limit. This per device setting seems to allow for multiple > drives u

Re: [Bacula-users] Restoring the catalog database - F14 to F17

2012-11-07 Thread Melissari, Ryan Joseph
I believe that is letting you know the database schema is not at the correct version. So in the process of moving to F17 you probably went to a newer version of bacula if installing from repositories. In the /etc/bacula folder there should be a update_bacula_tables script you can run to update

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume has been set to "FULL" and not "USED"

2012-11-07 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Sven Tegethoff : >> * This means that I've 4 volumes damaged? I tried this night with a >> new volume and the backup finished correctly. > > All the logs tell us is that the tape drive could not write to the tape > - without further investigation, it's impossible to say whether the >

[Bacula-users] Restoring the catalog database - F14 to F17

2012-11-07 Thread Gary Stainburn
As part of trying to build my new server I've taken the pg_dump output from the old server and used that to build thedatabase on the new server. However I get the following log entries. Can someone point me to the correct process for importing data. ta 07-Nov 15:42 bacula-dir JobId 0: Fatal er

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume has been set to "FULL" and not "USED"

2012-11-07 Thread Sven Tegethoff
> * This means that I've 4 volumes damaged? I tried this night with a > new volume and the backup finished correctly. All the logs tell us is that the tape drive could not write to the tape - without further investigation, it's impossible to say whether the tapes are at fault, the tape drive i

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Fedora 17

2012-11-07 Thread Gary Stainburn
On Wednesday 07 November 2012 12:51:35 Felix Schwarz wrote: > Hi Gary, > > PostgreSQL is supported. The README.Fedora file in > /usr/share/doc/bacula-common-5.2.11/ contains all the details. > > fs > Thanks for this Felix. I've worked through it, including restoring the backup from the old server,

[Bacula-users] Volume has been set to "FULL" and not "USED"

2012-11-07 Thread Mauro Colorio
I need some help, I 've 5 volumes in a Daily pool Pool { Name = Daily Pool Type = Backup Recycle = yes AutoPrune = yes Volume Retention = 5 days Maximum Volume Bytes = 800G Volume Use Duration = 23h Maximum Volumes = 5 } so I can do everyday for 5 days a backup and this has worke

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula on Fedora 17

2012-11-07 Thread Felix Schwarz
Hi Gary, PostgreSQL is supported. The README.Fedora file in /usr/share/doc/bacula-common-5.2.11/ contains all the details. fs -- LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management. Stay in control, upda

[Bacula-users] Bacula on Fedora 17

2012-11-07 Thread Gary Stainburn
Hi folks. I'm just replacing my old Fedora 14 based director / storage server with a Fedora 17 due to the HDD failing. However, a yum search bacula shows that the RPM's have changed. I no longer see ones configured for Postgresql. Are they no longer required or is Postgresql no longer supporte

Re: [Bacula-users] Priority Problem / Question

2012-11-07 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 04:15:18PM +0100, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de wrote: > > from my knowledge the jobs are created but take on hold as long as > other jobs with different priority are running. So it looks like the > catalog connections are established as part of the job creation. That > said yo