On 25.07.2012 17:22, John Drescher wrote:
>> Yes, I did. My problem is, The "use duration" is checked and the "Used
>> status" is set only at the end of a job that writes to the particular
>> volume, and not at the moment when bacula decides whether to overwrite
>> or to append to the volume.
>>
>
On 25.07.2012 17:50, Phil Stracchino wrote:
i think we need to understand more about the use cycle for these
volumes. Are these weekly tapes written to once per week with a single
job or set of jobs, or are they continuously appended to over the
course of a week?
Let's just take a look at th
Hi,
We're running 5.2.10 for both Windows 7 clients and our servers. My
system admins have noticed that when during restores of files to a
Windows 7 client that the restored files are all hidden which requires
them to then go in and uncheck the hide protected operating system files
option. A
Hello,
you should do the following:
cd /usr/libexec/bacula
./update_bacula_tables mysql
Some note here, unfortunately the manual is omitting the database
parameter if you're not using postgresql:
http://bacula.org/5.2.x-manuals/en/main/main/Installing_Bacula.html#SECTION00192
R
On 07/25/12 10:57, Sven Tegethoff wrote:
> On 25.07.2012 16:39, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> Now my problem is that bacula always leaves the last tape in
>> "appendable" state, and when the tape gets inserted for its next write
>> cycle, it will not overwrite this tape, but only append to it - even
>>
On 7/25/2012 9:52 AM, Tobias Dinse wrote:
> Ok, I compiled our 5.0.2 Version of Bacula and attached the new
> report. I hope this time its better bu I can still see an .
>
> I also tried to use 5.2.10 with 2 test machines. Both give the same
> error as 5.0.2 :(
>
Check the actual CFLAGS bei
Hi all,
I'm running CentOS 6.3 and I've just upgraded Bacula 5.0.0.x to the
newest version 5.2.10. from the rawhide repository. ( I'm using MYSQL as
my Database)
Ever since i did the upgrade my "bacula-dir and bacula-sd" Failed to
Start after the upgrade.
I read some documentation and they
> Yes, I did. My problem is, The "use duration" is checked and the "Used
> status" is set only at the end of a job that writes to the particular
> volume, and not at the moment when bacula decides whether to overwrite
> or to append to the volume.
>
Confused. These parameters are set in a text fil
On 25.07.2012 16:39, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Now my problem is that bacula always leaves the last tape in
> "appendable" state, and when the tape gets inserted for its next write
> cycle, it will not overwrite this tape, but only append to it - even
> though the retention period of the tape has ex
> Anyone else have this happen?
Probably a 1/2 dozen times over the years although it has not happened
in a long time.
> Race condition?
>
I think so. I thought that this was supposed to be fixed though.
John
--
Live Se
On 07/25/12 09:55, Sven Tegethoff wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I've tried to wrap my head around automatic volume recycling, but it
> seems that my backup strategy isn't quite compatible with Bacula's
> volume recycling policy, and maybe there's someone out here who knows a
> solution :)
>
> I'm
Hey all,
I've been meaning to post about this for awhile, but it comes up pretty
rarely (maybe once every few months running hundreds of job a night).
With an autochanger with 2 drives, each set to AutoSelect, it's possible
for bacula to want the same volume in both drives at the same time,
w
Hi everybody,
I've tried to wrap my head around automatic volume recycling, but it
seems that my backup strategy isn't quite compatible with Bacula's
volume recycling policy, and maybe there's someone out here who knows a
solution :)
I'm backing up multiple systems with multiple tape drives. F
Ok, I compiled our 5.0.2 Version of Bacula and attached the new report.
I hope this time its better bu I can still see an .
I also tried to use 5.2.10 with 2 test machines. Both give the same
error as 5.0.2 :(
regards
Tobias
Am 24.07.2012 19:45, schrieb Martin Simmons:
That's good, bu
I found this line:
RegexDir = ".*"
In the exclude options to be the issue. I've removed it and have been
getting the exact backups required.
Patti Clark
Information International Associates, Inc.
Linux Administrator and subcontractor to:
Research and Development Systems Support Oak Ridge
Bacula 5.0.2, CentOS 5.8 x86_64.
I need a second pair of eyes on this.
I have a large file system (/mnt/home, 60TB) whose backups are split into
multiple jobs. Two jobs in particular: one to backup all directories whose
names begin with "s" except for st123, and a second job to backup just st12
16 matches
Mail list logo
