On 06/15/2012 09:17 AM, Marco van Wieringen wrote:
> On 06/15/12 01:53 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
>> On 06/15/2012 04:36 AM, Marco van Wieringen wrote:
>>> Steven A. Falco optonline.net> writes:
> I closed the bug it should be part of 5.2.10 when that gets released. You can
> grab
> a copy from
Actually I just figured this out.
I needed the bootstrap files, and the directory that bacula writes the
backups in, to be owned by user 'bacula' and group 'bacula'.
And it seemed like I needed to create the bootstrap files manually:
touch /data/bootstrap/client1.bsr
touch /data/bootstrap/clien
On 6/15/2012 1:07 PM, Erich Weiler wrote:
> Hi Y'all,
>
> We have two RHEL 6 servers, one is running bacula-dir and bacula-sd
> (with a lot of disk storage for the backups), and the other is the
> client we want to back up from running bacula-fd.
>
> Both servers are behind different firewalls, an
To get the multiple streams I've broken my filesets and their corresponding
jobs into multiple pieces. The snippets below are 2 of the 7 that I created.
I am finding that I am getting everything in /home from each of these filesets
and not just the subset of the home directories. Testing with
Hi Y'all,
We have two RHEL 6 servers, one is running bacula-dir and bacula-sd
(with a lot of disk storage for the backups), and the other is the
client we want to back up from running bacula-fd.
Both servers are behind different firewalls, and each has a public IP
address that is configured fo
Il giorno ven, 15/06/2012 alle 10.52 -0400, John Drescher ha scritto:
> No this is absolutely not normal. Although I am not sure what caused
> that. Do you have the recycle flag set on your volumes?
Yes, recycle flag is set but in this case I've manually purged
a volume.
The only way to restore t
>> Restores to the Windows client systematically crash the FD on the
>> client without restoring anything. This seems to be a known, as
>> yet unsolved problem. There are several posts on this on the list.
Yes, we have the same problem. For now, we have rolled back our Windows
clients to 5.0.3 w
>> Suddenly, our tests with autochanger hangs with
>> message
>>
>> "Please mount Volume "001004L4" or label a new one for"
>
> I had to delete the volume and relabel again to get it working.
> Is this normal? To recycle a volume I have to delete it ?
>
No this is absolutely not normal. Although I
Il giorno ven, 15/06/2012 alle 15.15 +0200, Gandalf Corvotempesta ha
scritto:
> Suddenly, our tests with autochanger hangs with
> message
>
> "Please mount Volume "001004L4" or label a new one for"
I had to delete the volume and relabel again to get it working.
Is this normal? To recycle a volum
On 06/15/2012 03:43 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:41:21PM +0200, Georges wrote:
>> Le 14/06/2012 13:00, Uwe Schuerkamp a écrit :
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> I was wondering how bacula decides wether a job has already been
>>> copied to the next pool when using the PoolUncopiedJob
2012/6/15 Hugo Letemplier :
> 2012/6/15 Uwe Schuerkamp :
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:25:03PM +0200, Yougo wrote:
>>
>>> Is it possible to check a free space ratio on the storage daemon,
>>> fail a job if required instead of failing also the volumes, waiting
>>> for a mount… and thus avoid a
2012/6/15 Uwe Schuerkamp :
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:25:03PM +0200, Yougo wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to check a free space ratio on the storage daemon,
>> fail a job if required instead of failing also the volumes, waiting
>> for a mount… and thus avoid a lot of successive error that could
>
On 06/15/12 01:53 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
> On 06/15/2012 04:36 AM, Marco van Wieringen wrote:
>> Steven A. Falco optonline.net> writes:
>
>>> In other words, the call to rwl_writelock_p is returning EINVAL
>>> because the rwl is not valid. (I added a printf right before
>>> the return stateme
Suddenly, our tests with autochanger hangs with
message
"Please mount Volume "001004L4" or label a new one for"
Slots seems to be ok and properly labeled:
Slot | Volume Name| Status | Media Type | Pool
|
--+--+---+--+
On 06/15/2012 04:36 AM, Marco van Wieringen wrote:
> Steven A. Falco optonline.net> writes:
>> In other words, the call to rwl_writelock_p is returning EINVAL
>> because the rwl is not valid. (I added a printf right before
>> the return statement, so I am sure that this is the place the
>> EINVA
Thanks, everybody.
That was my /tmp directory, as you said. It was mounted with 16 Mb
inside the vserver. I corrected that and it works now.
All I have to do is updating my other servers in squeeze :)
Thanks again.
Jean-François
---
Il giorno ven, 15/06/2012 alle 11.32 +0200, Uwe Schuerkamp ha scritto:
> The recommended procedure is to dump your bacula db offsite (or to
> another host) after the backups complete. When you lose your
> backup-server or your database, recovering the current bacula state is
> just a mysql < dump.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:25:03PM +0200, Yougo wrote:
> Is it possible to check a free space ratio on the storage daemon,
> fail a job if required instead of failing also the volumes, waiting
> for a mount… and thus avoid a lot of successive error that could
> cause miscomprehension for the o
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:11:26AM +0200, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 15/06/2012 alle 04.57 -0400, John Drescher ha scritto:
> > bextract or bscan entire database + normal restore
>
> So, to restore from a tape i'll have to rescan the whole library
> and then restore it as usual?
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta
wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 15/06/2012 alle 04.57 -0400, John Drescher ha scritto:
>> bextract or bscan entire database + normal restore
>
> So, to restore from a tape i'll have to rescan the whole library
> and then restore it as usual?
>
If you
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:39:45AM +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> Am 13.06.2012 12:13, schrieb "M. Müller":
> > sometimes the restore seems to work and ends with Status=OK, but it
> > allways dies. If Status is "OK", then files are restored, and hopefully
> > all are restored.
> > The messa
Il giorno ven, 15/06/2012 alle 04.57 -0400, John Drescher ha scritto:
> bextract or bscan entire database + normal restore
So, to restore from a tape i'll have to rescan the whole library
and then restore it as usual?
It's very time consuming, why bacula doesn't update it's catalog
with files wro
> Ok, i'll try in this way.
> And how can I restore a file from a tapeset, in case of backup server
> failure?
>
bextract or bscan entire database + normal restore
>
> Actually i'm doing a copy job from a full set stored on disk to a tape
> library. In case i'll loose my disk-based storage, how c
Il giorno gio, 14/06/2012 alle 21.03 +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov ha
scritto:
> Sure: `bls` to list the tape contents and `bextract` to fetch something
> for test.
Ok, i'll try in this way.
And how can I restore a file from a tapeset, in case of backup server
failure?
Actually i'm doing a copy job
Am 13.06.2012 12:13, schrieb "M. Müller":
> sometimes the restore seems to work and ends with Status=OK, but it
> allways dies. If Status is "OK", then files are restored, and hopefully
> all are restored.
> The messages in the log file is allways: "bacula-fd: Bacula interrupted
> by signal 11
Steven A. Falco optonline.net> writes:
>
>
> In other words, the call to rwl_writelock_p is returning EINVAL
> because the rwl is not valid. (I added a printf right before
> the return statement, so I am sure that this is the place the
> EINVAL (err 22) comes from.)
>
> Again, dbcheck puts ou
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:41:21PM +0200, Georges wrote:
> Le 14/06/2012 13:00, Uwe Schuerkamp a écrit :
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I was wondering how bacula decides wether a job has already been
> > copied to the next pool when using the PoolUncopiedJobs selection
> > method. Can someone shed any ligh
27 matches
Mail list logo
