Re: [Bacula-users] Off site backups

2012-02-24 Thread Josh Fisher
On 2/24/2012 11:41 AM, Johannes Fabian Rußek wrote: > Hi John, > yes we are using disks. carrying tapes across the atlantic isn't > really an option unless you can walk on water and there is only one > known case of that. All you really need do is somehow copy the disk volume files to another

Re: [Bacula-users] Off site backups

2012-02-24 Thread Johannes Fabian Rußek
Hi John, yes we are using disks. carrying tapes across the atlantic isn't really an option unless you can walk on water and there is only one known case of that. On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:14 PM, John Drescher wrote: > > ToT* protocol does have an amazing throughput but has a very high latency >

Re: [Bacula-users] Off site backups

2012-02-24 Thread John Drescher
> ToT* protocol does have an amazing throughput but has a very high latency > and is very hard to monitor which is a dealbreaker for us unfortunately. > > Johannes > > *Tape over Truck > So are you using Tapes or disk volumes? I assumed you were using disk volumes because of ease of carrying tapes

Re: [Bacula-users] Off site backups

2012-02-24 Thread Johannes Fabian Rußek
ToT* protocol does have an amazing throughput but has a very high latency and is very hard to monitor which is a dealbreaker for us unfortunately. Johannes *Tape over Truck On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Jérôme Blion wrote: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:38:13 +0100, Johannes Fabian Rußek wrote: >

Re: [Bacula-users] Off site backups

2012-02-24 Thread Jérôme Blion
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:38:13 +0100, Johannes Fabian Rußek wrote: > I'm sorry, maybe I did not write it clear enough into my mail: > > [...] and does not want to rely on NFS across datacenters > > or rsyncing, for various reasons (throughput, security, > > reliability...) > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012

Re: [Bacula-users] Off site backups

2012-02-24 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:38:13 +0100 Johannes Fabian Rußek wrote: > I'm sorry, maybe I did not write it clear enough into my mail: > [...] and does not want to rely on NFS across datacenters > > or rsyncing, for various reasons (throughput, security, > > reliability...) [...] > > rsync the volume f

Re: [Bacula-users] Off site backups

2012-02-24 Thread John Drescher
> I'm sorry, maybe I did not write it clear enough into my mail: > > [...] and does not want to rely on NFS across datacenters > >> or rsyncing, for various reasons (throughput, security, >> reliability...) > My fault for not paying attention.. Obviously you could rsync the volume files to externa

Re: [Bacula-users] Off site backups

2012-02-24 Thread Johannes Fabian Rußek
I'm sorry, maybe I did not write it clear enough into my mail: [...] and does not want to rely on NFS across datacenters > or rsyncing, for various reasons (throughput, security, > reliability...) On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:30 PM, John Drescher wrote: > 2012/2/24 Johannes Fabian Rußek : > > H

Re: [Bacula-users] Off site backups

2012-02-24 Thread Victor Hugo dos Santos
2012/2/24 Johannes Fabian Rußek : > Hi everybody, > I'm planning on how move off-site backups around from bacula. > Originally I thought something like the copy or migration job from one > SD on one site to another SD at a second site, but I realized that > migration jobs only work within one SD. >

Re: [Bacula-users] Off site backups

2012-02-24 Thread John Drescher
2012/2/24 Johannes Fabian Rußek : > Hi everybody, > I'm planning on how move off-site backups around from bacula. > Originally I thought something like the copy or migration job from one > SD on one site to another SD at a second site, but I realized that > migration jobs only work within one SD. >

[Bacula-users] Off site backups

2012-02-24 Thread Johannes Fabian Rußek
Hi everybody, I'm planning on how move off-site backups around from bacula. Originally I thought something like the copy or migration job from one SD on one site to another SD at a second site, but I realized that migration jobs only work within one SD. I guess I am not the first or only person tha