On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:58:33 -0500, Paul Mather wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
>> On the flip side, compression seems to be a very big win. I'm
>> seeing ratios from 1.7 to 2.5x savings and the CPU usage is claimed to
>> be relatively cheap.
>
>
> That's what I am s
On Feb 9, 2012, at 2:21 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Mark wrote:
>> Steven, out of curiosity, do you see any benefit with dedup (assuming that
>> bacula volumes are the only thing on a given zfs volume). I did some
>> initial trials and it appeared that bacula
Am 06.02.2012 12:51, schrieb Martin Simmons:
>
> Not quite what you are asking, but you could set the NextPool as necessary for
> the Virtual Fulls and then use this hack for the Copy jobs:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.backup.bacula.devel/14084
Thanks for the input everyone. I f
On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:05 AM, Mark wrote:
> Steven, out of curiosity, do you see any benefit with dedup (assuming that
> bacula volumes are the only thing on a given zfs volume). I did some initial
> trials and it appeared that bacula savesets don't dedup much, if at all, and
> some searching a
Hello again,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2012, at 10:07 AM, Martin Simmons wrote:
>
> >> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 20:22:46 -0600, Mark said:
> >>
> >> Just checking to see if people are having success with storage daemon
> >> running on FreeBSD 9.0 with
On Feb 9, 2012, at 10:07 AM, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 20:22:46 -0600, Mark said:
>>
>> Just checking to see if people are having success with storage daemon
>> running on FreeBSD 9.0 with ZFS and compression enabled? I ask because I'm
>> having issues with the backups co
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 20:22:46 -0600, Mark said:
>
> Just checking to see if people are having success with storage daemon
> running on FreeBSD 9.0 with ZFS and compression enabled? I ask because I'm
> having issues with the backups completing without any errors reported, but
> then an immedi
Hi, I've just installed a new backup system consisting of An IBM
TS3100 (
LTO5) with bacula 5.2.5 running on an openSUSE 12.1 x86_64 server.
I'm having VERY low backup speed with 99.99% io usage from jbd2 and
don't know what could be causing it. I see this behav
Yes,
site-to-site VPN is the solution.
NAL will expose your clients to internet.
Kleber
Em 09/02/2012 10:30, Christopher Geegan escreveu:
> Thanks for your feedback. Sounds like I didn't miss anything then. I am
> trying to backup clients from home networks. These users generally don't have
>
Thanks for your feedback. Sounds like I didn't miss anything then. I am trying
to backup clients from home networks. These users generally don't have IPSEC
capable routers which stops the site-to-site idea. Your also right that I could
use non-defualt ports but this would deviate from default co
10 matches
Mail list logo
