On 30 Jan 2012, at 16:05, Adrian Reyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:18:30PM +, Joe Nyland wrote:
>> When run manually this morning, I was given a little more information:
>> run job=FileServer1_Copy pool=FileServer1_Full storage=FileServer1_Full
>> 30-Jan 06:55 FileServer1-dir JobId 0:
Hello-
Since upgrading to 5.2.3 from 5.0.3 on a FreeBSD 7.4 server two weeks
ago, I've started seeing this message:
28-Jan 06:08 pisces-sd JobId 8299: End of Volume at file 1 on device
"FileStoragecepheus" (/backup), Volume
"Backup_cepheus-fd_2012-01-28_00.05.01"
28-Jan 06:08 pisces-sd JobId 8299
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:55:24 -0500, mark bergman said:
>
> The fact that the server rebooted between job 42856 and job 42879 makes
> me wonder if something in the fibre/SCSI initialization or bacula-sd
> startup causes tapes to be rewound but not ejected.
The bacula-sd startup will rewind t
In the message dated: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:54:34 +0100,
The pithy ruminations from =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Papp_Rudolf_P=E9ter?= on
<[Bacula-users] cannot read prelabeled volume> were:
=> Hello Everyone!
=>
=> I have a weird problem. I manage an one-maschine-backup with bacula
=> 5.0.2 (Debian Squeeze) fr
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:20:15AM +, keith wrote:
> We have about 80 virtual servers running on 20 Physical servers that
> need backed up.
I tend and just ignore that problem as my virtual servers have quite
different data on it and the network is the limiting factor here, not
the disk io. N
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:18:30PM +, Joe Nyland wrote:
> When run manually this morning, I was given a little more information:
> run job=FileServer1_Copy pool=FileServer1_Full storage=FileServer1_Full
> 30-Jan 06:55 FileServer1-dir JobId 0: Fatal error: No Next Pool specification
> found in
Hello everyone,I emailed the list previously about some issues which I am having with copy jobs in my Bacula setup - I appear to have resolved my previous problems, however I'm now faced with the following issue:This morning, I noticed that in my backup reports from Bacula, I had the following logg
We have about 80 virtual servers running on 20 Physical servers that
need backed up.
Our Bacula implementation is now at scheduling stage and we are stuck
trying to figure out how to get the virtual servers to backup without
them all running concurrently overwhelming the physical servers that
Op 29/01/2012 14:54, Papp Rudolf Péter schreef:
> Hello Everyone!
>
> I have a weird problem. I manage an one-maschine-backup with bacula
> 5.0.2 (Debian Squeeze) from localhost to a SCSI LTO-3 (Ultrium) drive.
> It's a simple situation. When I label a tape then I can read back that
> label with bt
Hello,
this is my setup. I defined 2 filebased storage devices, file-1 and
file-2. They are mapped to the folder /bacula-stor/file-1 and
/bacula-stor/file-2. I defined 2 pools, pool-1 and pool-2, that are
mapped to the storage devices. Pool-1 has his Next Pool directive set to
pool-2.
I have
10 matches
Mail list logo