Re: [Bacula-users] Database performance issue

2011-07-20 Thread Dan Langille
On Jul 19, 2011, at 5:45 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: >> Starting a file-based restore job, this led to postgresql spending a >> full 15 minutes in a query. Any idea what can be done to fix this? >> >> http://paste.ubuntu.com/647576/ has a full explain/analyze of the >> query, but so far, I ha

Re: [Bacula-users] Less intervention as Possible.

2011-07-20 Thread Rickifer Barros
Yeah, John...it workedthanks man. On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:17 PM, John Drescher wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:13 PM, John Drescher > wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Rickifer Barros > > wrote: > >> Could I do a "release" command using the Directive "Run After Job"? > >> >

Re: [Bacula-users] Less intervention as Possible.

2011-07-20 Thread John Drescher
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:13 PM, John Drescher wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Rickifer Barros > wrote: >> Could I do a "release" command using the Directive "Run After Job"? >> > > I believe that would work in a script. > Yes it I believe should work in a run after job. You may want t

Re: [Bacula-users] Less intervention as Possible.

2011-07-20 Thread John Drescher
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Rickifer Barros wrote: > Could I do a "release" command using the Directive "Run After Job"? > I believe that would work in a script. John -- 10 Tips for Better Web Security Learn 10 way

Re: [Bacula-users] Less intervention as Possible.

2011-07-20 Thread Rickifer Barros
Could I do a "release" command using the Directive "Run After Job"? On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:55 PM, John Drescher wrote: > > Is it possible send a unmount command after specific jobs? Therefore I > could > > set up my Backup Catalog Jobs to umount the tape at Fridays and > > Saturdaysso the

Re: [Bacula-users] Less intervention as Possible.

2011-07-20 Thread John Drescher
> Is it possible send a unmount command after specific jobs? Therefore I could > set up my Backup Catalog Jobs to umount the tape at Fridays and > Saturdaysso the "Offline on Umount" directive would eject the tape. > You can execute an admin job that scripts to bconsole to release the volume.

[Bacula-users] Less intervention as Possible.

2011-07-20 Thread Rickifer Barros
Hello one more time... I'm trying to configure my Bacula so that I don't have to mount and umount manually the tapes after the jobs but I'm not getting this... My Backup Scheme is like that: tue-fri - Differentialls in the same tape sat - Full in another tape Also I have 2 daily jobs: Backup Fi

Re: [Bacula-users] cant get offline tape from drive in autochanger

2011-07-20 Thread Christian Tardif
On 20/07/11 11:06 AM, Robert Kromoser wrote: Hi all. After my tests are almost done with bacula and the Tandberg T24 autochanger now I erased the contents of the tape A9 for using it in the production bacula environment. I did the following: bacula stop mtx-changer /dev/sg5 loadad 0

[Bacula-users] cant get offline tape from drive in autochanger

2011-07-20 Thread Robert Kromoser
Hi all. After my tests are almost done with bacula and the Tandberg T24 autochanger now I erased the contents of the tape A9 for using it in the production bacula environment. I did the following: bacula stop mtx-changer /dev/sg5 loadad 0 /dev/nst0 0 I got the Slot number 9 with the

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning Jobs older than 6 months

2011-07-20 Thread Rickifer Barros
Also, I could set up for my Jobs and Files Retention the same that Volume Retention without problems, is that right? On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Rickifer Barros wrote: > Thanks Jeremy...I'll do that. > > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Jeremy Maes wrote: > >> >> Op 20/07/2011 16:03, Ri

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning Jobs older than 6 months

2011-07-20 Thread Rickifer Barros
Thanks Jeremy...I'll do that. On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Jeremy Maes wrote: > > Op 20/07/2011 16:03, Rickifer Barros schreef: > > Ok...but I don't want to disable the pruning entirely...I want Bacula do > the pruning only according my settings. If I set the Autoprune=no Will do > Bacula p

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning Jobs older than 6 months

2011-07-20 Thread Jeremy Maes
Op 20/07/2011 16:03, Rickifer Barros schreef: Ok...but I don't want to disable the pruning entirely...I want Bacula do the pruning only according my settings. If I set the Autoprune=no Will do Bacula pruning jobs according the Volume Retention? Because I have configured the Volume Retentions b

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning Jobs older than 6 months

2011-07-20 Thread Rickifer Barros
Ok...but I don't want to disable the pruning entirely...I want Bacula do the pruning only according my settings. If I set the Autoprune=no Will do Bacula pruning jobs according the Volume Retention? Because I have configured the Volume Retentions but not the Job Retentions. On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at

Re: [Bacula-users] Pruning Jobs older than 6 months

2011-07-20 Thread Jeremy Maes
Op 20/07/2011 15:20, Rickifer Barros schreef: > Hello Guys... > > Why Bacula always after each Job try to prune Jobs older than 6 months > even when there's no settings to this? > > 20-Jul 10:01 test-dir JobId 96: Begin pruning Jobs older than 6 months . > 20-Jul 10:01 test-dir JobId 96: No Jobs f

[Bacula-users] Pruning Jobs older than 6 months

2011-07-20 Thread Rickifer Barros
Hello Guys... Why Bacula always after each Job try to prune Jobs older than 6 months even when there's no settings to this? 20-Jul 10:01 test-dir JobId 96: Begin pruning Jobs older than 6 months . 20-Jul 10:01 test-dir JobId 96: No Jobs found to prune. 20-Jul 10:01 test-dir JobId 96: Begin prunin