Hi,
We have two storage directors: one locally and one located at an off-site data
center. Our connection to the data center is a 10G link (but it's shared with
other UC universities). Using programs like BBFTP, we've been able to achieve
actual data throughput of something like 600Mbit/s to
Doh. I mean to say "If I'm *not* pointing to removable media"...
On 06/02/2011 02:59 PM, Mike Seda wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'm currently tweaking a Bacula D2D setup, and am wondering if I
> should be writing to a disk-based Autochanger versus directly to a
> disk-based Device. If I'm pointing to rem
Hi All,
I'm currently tweaking a Bacula D2D setup, and am wondering if I should
be writing to a disk-based Autochanger versus directly to a disk-based
Device. If I'm pointing to removable media, I should just write directly
to one or more Devices (w/o an Autochanger), right?
Mike
-
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:01 AM, derbysig wrote:
> Anybody helping in this? I am very interested to know about this too, as I am
> using a LTO3 and will most likely be upgrading to a LTO5 somewhere end of
> this year.
> Hope to learn from the replies from the knowledgeable people here!
Remember
Hello Cleuson.
What exactly is your problem, I mean, why would you need to restore some
Incremental backup but not all? Maybe by understanding your problem we can
help you.
Anyway, you can restore only specific JobID's using restore in bconsole,
maybe you can pass the jobid's of the Incremental B
2011/6/2 Rickifer Barros :
> A bad backup is the same that none backup. Verifying is very important,
> nevertheless, is not 100% safe. The only and almost impracticable way would
> be often make disaster recovery simulations.
I see that some users do test restores periodically. I have done that
a
A bad backup is the same that none backup. Verifying is very important,
nevertheless, is not 100% safe. The only and almost impracticable way would
be often make disaster recovery simulations.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:26:44 -0300, Ricki
Anybody helping in this? I am very interested to know about this too, as I am
using a LTO3 and will most likely be upgrading to a LTO5 somewhere end of this
year.
Hope to learn from the replies from the knowledgeable people here!
+
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:26:44 -0300, Rickifer Barros said:
>
> So, whatever how it does, I think that is a good idea set up a Verify Job
> soon after a Backup Job to ensure that data in the volume, isn't it?
Yes, that's what I do, but some people claim that it wastes time and wears out
the ta
So, whatever how it does, I think that is a good idea set up a Verify Job
soon after a Backup Job to ensure that data in the volume, isn't it?
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:10:32 +0200, Ralf Gross said:
> >
> > I always thought that a Volume
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:10:32 +0200, Ralf Gross said:
>
> I always thought that a VolumeToCatalog job would not read the
> data written to the volume and calculate the md5sum again. Instead it
> would just read the file attributes that were written to the volume and
> compare that with the att
John Drescher schrieb:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:
> > John Drescher schrieb:
> >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:
> >> > Rickifer Barros schrieb:
> >> >> Yes John...
> >> >>
> >> >> Now, I think that I understood perfectly and I have tested it too.
> >>
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:20 AM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:
>> John Drescher schrieb:
>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:
>>> > Rickifer Barros schrieb:
>>> >> Yes John...
>>> >>
>>> >> Now, I think that I understood perfectly and I
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:
> John Drescher schrieb:
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:
>> > Rickifer Barros schrieb:
>> >> Yes John...
>> >>
>> >> Now, I think that I understood perfectly and I have tested it too.
>> >>
>> >> VolumeToCatalog = Compares the
John Drescher schrieb:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:
> > Rickifer Barros schrieb:
> >> Yes John...
> >>
> >> Now, I think that I understood perfectly and I have tested it too.
> >>
> >> VolumeToCatalog = Compares the files in a Storage Volume with the Catalog;
> >
> >
> > Vol
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:
> Rickifer Barros schrieb:
>> Yes John...
>>
>> Now, I think that I understood perfectly and I have tested it too.
>>
>> VolumeToCatalog = Compares the files in a Storage Volume with the Catalog;
>
>
> VolumeToCatalog does not read the file content
Rickifer Barros schrieb:
> Yes John...
>
> Now, I think that I understood perfectly and I have tested it too.
>
> VolumeToCatalog = Compares the files in a Storage Volume with the Catalog;
VolumeToCatalog does not read the file content and compares it, it just
reads the attributs and compares t
17 matches
Mail list logo
