On 03/29/2011 04:21 AM, Alan Brown wrote:
> Mike Carlson wrote:
>
>> I had recently changed the bacula-sd.conf from using " Maximum Block
>> Size = 262144", to whatever the default value is. I didn't realize that
>> by undoing this, all previous backups would no longer be readable (since
>> I gues
>> I had recently changed the bacula-sd.conf from using " Maximum Block
>> Size = 262144", to whatever the default value is. I didn't realize that
>> by undoing this, all previous backups would no longer be readable (since
>> I guess the SD is expecting a different block size?). So, I added that
>
Dobbin,
probably you have a problem with retention periods.
When you select 5 option on restore command you should able to see the
entire chain of backup (FDIII...)?
Maybe you full backup has already expired and the media has been recycled.
Kleber
2011/3/29 dobbin
> Hi there,
> backup server i
Hi there,
backup server is Debian lenny running bacula 5.02, client is debian sarge
running bacula 1.38.11.
The server is a web server and on the 22nd a copy was made of the main site, if
you look at the backup job for that day, you can see an extra 4000 files. We're
running daily incrementals
Hello,
I wanna accomplish the following:
1.- Full back up the first saunday of every month, incremental back up Mon
through Fri and differential backup every Sun except for the first Sun of
the month. So far I have this:
Schedule {
Name = "WeeklyCycle"
Run = Level=Full 1st sun at 18:00
Mike Carlson wrote:
> I had recently changed the bacula-sd.conf from using " Maximum Block
> Size = 262144", to whatever the default value is. I didn't realize that
> by undoing this, all previous backups would no longer be readable (since
> I guess the SD is expecting a different block size?)
Mhm... I had a similar Problem...
I solved it when I set the Address-Setting in the Dir and SD-Configs,
into quotes...
What says status storage?
How do your configs look like?
Am 28.03.2011 18:01, schrieb Roland Plüss:
> (Tried to send this already but it looks like it failed)
>
> I'm running he