Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Can't connect to Remote.

Follow-up: I loaded Bacula client (5.0.2) on a Fedora 14 box which is behind the firewall (EMMA) and is 1 IP address different from KIRA. I took down iptables (since it is redundant and to minimize errors. Same basic error: "Fatal error: bsock.c:135 Unable to connect to Client: emma.sbanetweb.co

Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for - (I assumed file devices auto created volumes?)

It seems your have not auto label enabled. Can you post your config files? Just remove your passwords. Kleber 2010/12/30 Mister IT Guru > I've run into a problem, which seems to be expected with tape > changers, but I have disk based storage. I am under the assumption that > when auto-label is

[Bacula-users] bacula-web, bweb, et al

I'm curious how many people use the bacula-web and/or bweb applications. I spent the better part of the morning trying to get bacula-web working but it appears to be failing in PHP land somewhere. I then tried bweb, which was also in the gui tar file, and got that working in a matter of minutes

[Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for - (I assumed file devices auto created volumes?)

I've run into a problem, which seems to be expected with tape changers, but I have disk based storage. I am under the assumption that when auto-label is enabled, that a new volume will be automatically created when required. I can't babysit the backups and manually mount and create new volume

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula and glusterfs

> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:22:55 -0700, Devin Reade said: > > Martin Simmons wrote: > > > I read that glusterfs uses FUSE, so it might be checking something more than > > the uid. That would explain why a root shell can access the files. Note > > that > > the error is "Operation not permitt

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-Users] Bweb showing finished verify jobs with differences as running

> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:24:05 GMT, Martin Simmons said: > > On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:36:58 +0100, Jeremy Maes said: > > > > I posted the requested info as a comment on the bug report (since the > > mantis signup seems fixed) > > Everything can thus be found right here. > >

Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to understand why device FileStorage can't access the disk? [SOLVED]

On 30/12/2010 12:16, Jeremy Maes wrote: > > However after thinking on it you might still need to check your > permissions again to make sure the folders are all writeable by the > bacula user. I ran chown -R bacula:bacula /backup to ensure that the bacula owner could access the file system, and

[Bacula-users] Fwd: Can't connect

I will try to look at this later. I am forwarding to the rest of the list for others to possibly answer. I really need to get some non bacula related programming done in the next two days.. John -- Forwarded message -- From: Wayne Spivak Date: Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9:31 AM Subject

[Bacula-users] Fwd: Device is BLOCKED

On 29/12/2010 03:41, John Drescher wrote: > > Sometines bacula sd gets confused about media changes especially when > the tape it wants is not in the changer or it also sometimes gets Yes, that's my experience too (with 5.0.3) > confused if you use the umount command. Or if you moved or added > v

[Bacula-users] Fwd: Can't connect to Remote.

-- Forwarded message -- From: John Drescher Date: Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9:26 AM Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Can't connect to Remote. To: Wayne Spivak On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Wayne Spivak wrote: > Installed Bacula 5.0.2 on Fedora 14 (called Kira). > > Previously had it i

[Bacula-users] Can't connect to Remote.

Installed Bacula 5.0.2 on Fedora 14 (called Kira). Previously had it installed and working on Fedora 11 (called Beech) I copied all the conf files from Beech to Kira (adjusted them for new machine) and Bacula started. Did a backup on Kira with out problems. Went to test on Ladymax (on other sid

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows 2003 agent performance

> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:10:26 -0800, Richard Amerman said: > > I'm having issues with the performance of the bacula agent, 5.0.3 32bit, > on Win 2003 32bit installed cleanly in a Virtualbox VM with 4 procs and > 3GB ram, with little in use. > > This machine uses very little cpu under nor

Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to understand why device FileStorage can't access the disk?

Op 30/12/2010 12:48, Mister IT Guru schreef: >On 30/12/2010 11:39, Jeremy Maes wrote: >> Op 30/12/2010 12:03, Mister IT Guru schreef: >>> When I run a backup, I end up with this error: >>> >>> 30-Dec 10:53 bacula.local JobId 16: Warning: mount.c:217 Open device >>> "FileStorage" (/backups/

Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to understand why device FileStorage can't access the disk?

On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:03:07AM +, Mister IT Guru wrote: > When I run a backup, I end up with this error: > > 30-Dec 10:53 bacula.local JobId 16: Warning: mount.c:217 Open device > "FileStorage" (/backups/default) Volume "BaculaBackups-0001" failed: > ERR=dev.c:549 Could not open: /back

Re: [Bacula-users] rpm's for CentOS 4.8 & RhEL 5.5 available

On 29.12.2010 2:25, Kleber Leal wrote: > Hi Jari, > > you can generate your own rpm files. > Get the src.rpm file available on download session on bacula website and > follow as below: > > for x86 > > rpmbuild --rebuild --define build_rhel5=1 --define build_mysql=1 > bacula-5.0.3-*x*.src.rpm >

Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to understand why device FileStorage can't access the disk?

On 30/12/2010 11:39, Jeremy Maes wrote: > Op 30/12/2010 12:03, Mister IT Guru schreef: >> When I run a backup, I end up with this error: >> >> 30-Dec 10:53 bacula.local JobId 16: Warning: mount.c:217 Open device >> "FileStorage" (/backups/default) Volume "BaculaBackups-0001" failed: >> ERR=de

Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to understand why device FileStorage can't access the disk?

On 30/12/2010 11:36, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:03:07AM +, Mister IT Guru wrote: >>When I run a backup, I end up with this error: >> >> 30-Dec 10:53 bacula.local JobId 16: Warning: mount.c:217 Open device >> "FileStorage" (/backups/default) Volume "BaculaBackups-00

Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to understand why device FileStorage can't access the disk?

Op 30/12/2010 12:03, Mister IT Guru schreef: >When I run a backup, I end up with this error: > > 30-Dec 10:53 bacula.local JobId 16: Warning: mount.c:217 Open device > "FileStorage" (/backups/default) Volume "BaculaBackups-0001" failed: > ERR=dev.c:549 Could not open: /backups/default/BaculaBac

[Bacula-users] Trying to understand why device FileStorage can't access the disk?

When I run a backup, I end up with this error: 30-Dec 10:53 bacula.local JobId 16: Warning: mount.c:217 Open device "FileStorage" (/backups/default) Volume "BaculaBackups-0001" failed: ERR=dev.c:549 Could not open: /backups/default/BaculaBackups-0001, ERR=No such file or directory The direct

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula: Keyword Name not permitted in this resource

Op 20:59, Robert Garza schreef: Hello, Try removing the spaces in between the "Run After Job" and "Run After Failed Job" directive blocks. http://bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Configuring_Director.html#SECTION00183 Maybe a bit late (original poster's problem has a

Re: [Bacula-users] Verify and admin job retention

Op 29/12/2010 21:00, Martin Simmons schreef: >> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:32:28 +0100, Jeremy Maes said: >> When checking some things at our clients' sites where we are testing >> bacula I found out that >> our retention periods (and auto-pruning) don't seem to work for verify >> jobs and admin jo