[Bacula-users] Unable to restore using different storage device.

2010-11-23 Thread brodie
Hello, I am having issues trying to restore to a different client and storage device then originally did the backup job. In our setup we have 1 director, 2 clients and 2 storage devices. I can restore fine if I run the restore job using the same storage device that backed it up, the problem I'm

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and automatic labelling of volumes

2010-11-23 Thread John Drescher
> recycled volumes are not relabeled, only when they are created are they > labeled AFAIK That is correct. If you want to change the name. Its probably better to delete and create a new volume. John -- Increase Visibilit

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and automatic labelling of volumes

2010-11-23 Thread Blake Dunlap
recycled volumes are not relabeled, only when they are created are they labeled AFAIK On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 16:17, Paulo Martinez wrote: > Am 23.11.2010 um 19:53 schrieb Thomas Schweikle: > > Hi! > > > > I have set up bacula with automatic labelling of volumes: > > > > In bacula-dir.conf: > > S

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and automatic labelling of volumes

2010-11-23 Thread Paulo Martinez
Am 23.11.2010 um 19:53 schrieb Thomas Schweikle: > Hi! > > I have set up bacula with automatic labelling of volumes: > > In bacula-dir.conf: > Storage { > Name = File > Address = bacula > SDPort = 9103 > Password = "" > Device = FileStorage > Media Type = File > } > > Pool { > Name = Fil

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and automatic labelling of volumes

2010-11-23 Thread Thomas Schweikle
Am 23.11.2010 21:50, schrieb John Drescher: >> Which parts does bacula do, which does it not? >> >>> - Start a job, >>> - look for an empty volume, if none there, create one, than label it > > It looks here for an appendable volume. Although if all of your > volumes are use volume once /ma

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and automatic labelling of volumes

2010-11-23 Thread John Drescher
> Which parts does bacula do, which does it not? > >>     - Start a job, >>     - look for an empty volume, if none there, create one, than label it It looks here for an appendable volume. Although if all of your volumes are use volume once /max jobs =1 it will only find empty ones. >>     - push

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and automatic labelling of volumes

2010-11-23 Thread Thomas Schweikle
Am 23.11.2010 20:55, schrieb Blake Dunlap: > Bacula does not act like you wish, you could script parts of this to > accomplish what you want, but you cannot do it natively. Which parts does bacula do, which does it not? > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:53, Thomas Schweikle [...] > > Automatic c

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula and automatic labelling of volumes

2010-11-23 Thread Blake Dunlap
Bacula does not act like you wish, you could script parts of this to accomplish what you want, but you cannot do it natively. On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:53, Thomas Schweikle wrote: > Hi! > > I have set up bacula with automatic labelling of volumes: > > In bacula-dir.conf: > Storage { > Name = F

[Bacula-users] Bacula and automatic labelling of volumes

2010-11-23 Thread Thomas Schweikle
Hi! I have set up bacula with automatic labelling of volumes: In bacula-dir.conf: Storage { Name = File Address = bacula SDPort = 9103 Password = "" Device = FileStorage Media Type = File } Pool { Name = File Pool Type = Backup Recycle = yes recycle Volumes AutoPrune =

Re: [Bacula-users] Incremental Backup / Moved File doesn't get stored in the backup

2010-11-23 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:15:17 +0100, martinezino said: > > Dear List, > > i started using bacula a couple of weeks ago and i am very satisfied. > > Today i noticed on doing an incremental backup that a file that was > moved > from one directory to another doesn't get stored in the backup

Re: [Bacula-users] Understanding purge

2010-11-23 Thread Dermot Beirne
On 22 November 2010 18:55, Blake Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:02, Dermot Beirne wrote: >> >> That particular feature would be good news for me at least! >> I definitely would really like to see the ability to automatically >> purge volumes also, and leave it to the user to decide if