2010/11/18 Thomas Mueller
> On 18.11.2010 02:01, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> >>
> >> IMHO TLS is only used for the "control-channel" not for the "data-
> >> channel".
> >
> > Really? I hope not. Can you prove this?
> >
>
> ok maybe you're right. i've had in mind that it was not encrypted, but
> writt
I've just read that doing the command "run" on the bacula console executes the
job immediately and disregards the schedule.
Thanks for the reply guys.
+--
|This was sent by testingmode123...@yahoo.com via Backup Central.
|Forward
On 18.11.2010 02:01, Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>> IMHO TLS is only used for the "control-channel" not for the "data-
>> channel".
>
> Really? I hope not. Can you prove this?
>
ok maybe you're right. i've had in mind that it was not encrypted, but
written is that the volumes written by sd are not en
On 11/17/10 19:16, Dermot Beirne wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> I have set a size limit of 5Gb on each volume. My daily incrementals
> are using over 300 such volumes at the moment, so 200 will be nowhere
> near enough to do a full backup of all the clients at year end, so
> I'll be increasing that before th
On 11/17/2010 11:12 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Am Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:52:20 +0100 schrieb Hugo Letemplier:
>
>> Hi
>> I am Implementing Bacula and I have to cypher the backed up data. Also I
>> don't want that the console and client authentication to be done clearly
>> over the network.
>> I want
On 11/17/2010 9:46 AM, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:02:50 -0500, Dan Langille said:
>>
>> Last night while labeling Volumes, I encountered the following data
>> error on each labeling attempt:
>>
>> block.c:275 Volume data error at 0:0! Wanted ID: "BB02", got "stfi".
>>
Hi Martin,
I read that, and understand it doesn't run automatically, but must be
called from a runscript, or whatever.
However, my understanding is that the volumes need to be marked as
purged before this feature will truncate them?
It does not purge them, but truncates any which have a status of
p
Thanks Blake,
I am thinking migration is the way to go also. I'll look into your
patch tomorrow.
Thank you.
Dermot.
On 17 November 2010 23:30, Blake Dunlap wrote:
> Basicly what I see here is that you really want a migration, not a copy job.
> This coupled with the patch from
> http://www.mai
Hi Phil,
I have set a size limit of 5Gb on each volume. My daily incrementals
are using over 300 such volumes at the moment, so 200 will be nowhere
near enough to do a full backup of all the clients at year end, so
I'll be increasing that before then. My problem is I don't have
enough disk space
W dniu 16.11.2010 03:50, Dan Langille pisze:
> Here is my nagios script for verifying that my regression tests are
> showing up on the server. Feel free to use it or modify it. Keep the
> copyright notice please.
Hi,
Thanks for the script. I made a few changes. The following code should
work o
Basicly what I see here is that you really want a migration, not a copy job.
This coupled with the patch from
http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-de...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg04724.htmlshould
do what you want if you set the new option in the migration job (from
the patch, believe it is "Migrate Pu
On 11/17/10 05:48, Dermot Beirne wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Here is the pool definitions I'm using.
>
> Is there some way I can get the entire "disk" pool volumes purged when
> they expire, so they are all truncated and all that space is released.
> I don't need them once they are copied to tape. Wo
Hi Blake,
That sounds great, exactly what I've been looking for by the sound of it.
If you can provide this and some details of how to get it working, I
for one would be very interested and grateful.
Incidently, how would using such a patch affect upgrading Bacula in
future, etc. I presume you ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
So I have just seen a case where an old tape with a job that had it's
file
records pruned by the File Retention was bscan'd to get the records back into
the database.
The operator then tried to run a restore, but had managed to leave the
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:30:33 +0100, C Keschnat said:
>
> I'm having problems with long running select statements (bacula 5.0.2).
> After activating mysql-slow-logs, I saw logs similar to
>
> # Time: 101117 11:32:56
> # u...@host: bacula[bacula] @ localhost []
> # Query_time: 2793 Lock_tim
Hi, i have instaled Centos 5.5 server with bacula 5.0.3
my firts workstation to backup is windows 7 pro, all good.
but wen i install client on Windows XP, never connect from director...
i loose one week searching solutions, today y get whats is wrong, on
bacula-fd.conf
all reference to direct
If you guys would like, I can attach the patch we apply to make migrations
purge the jobs themselves as well and thus cause volumes to properly
autoprune.
We also run a perl script to prune/purge any expired volumes every few
hours.
-Blake
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 05:58, Graham Keeling wrote:
Hi,
I'm having problems with long running select statements (bacula 5.0.2).
After activating mysql-slow-logs, I saw logs similar to
# Time: 101117 11:32:56
# u...@host: bacula[bacula] @ localhost []
# Query_time: 2793 Lock_time: 0 Rows_sent: 127104387 Rows_examined:
127104387
use bacula;
SELE
Am Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:52:20 +0100 schrieb Hugo Letemplier:
> Hi
> I am Implementing Bacula and I have to cypher the backed up data. Also I
> don't want that the console and client authentication to be done clearly
> over the network.
> I want to implement TLS but data are already cyphered via PKI
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 07:02:50 -0500, Dan Langille said:
>
> Last night while labeling Volumes, I encountered the following data
> error on each labeling attempt:
>
>block.c:275 Volume data error at 0:0! Wanted ID: "BB02", got "stfi".
>Buffer discarded.
Did the tapes contain non-Bac
Hi!
We're seeing strange behaviour with Bacula 5.0.3 on Debian/Squeeze and
Kernels 2.6.36 and 2.6.32 (for a while, we've had CentOS 5 for testing,
but that didn't change a thing).
See the 'btape fill' results below, the write speed doesn't get above
50MB/s - the tape drive is an ULTRIUM-HH4 LTO4
Last night while labeling Volumes, I encountered the following data
error on each labeling attempt:
block.c:275 Volume data error at 0:0! Wanted ID: "BB02", got "stfi".
Buffer discarded.
The full output for one tape appears below (some whitespace has been
added to put the commands on each
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:28:06 +0100, Thorsten Reichelt said:
>
> On every last sunday of a month I backup my clients to an LTO drive. After
> all of these backup jobs are finished, I want to eject the tape. A solution
> may be to set a RunAfterJob script for the last executed backup job. But
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:32:44AM +, Dermot Beirne wrote:
> Hi Graham,
> I think this is a key feature, and am surprised it's not easily
> possible. The user should have the choice. I saw the blog entries
> you refer to, and that bug appears to have been fixed, but I don't see
> what use it
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:32:44 +, Dermot Beirne said:
>
> Hi Graham,
> I think this is a key feature, and am surprised it's not easily
> possible. The user should have the choice. I saw the blog entries
> you refer to, and that bug appears to have been fixed, but I don't see
> what use i
Hi Graham,
I think this is a key feature, and am surprised it's not easily
possible. The user should have the choice. I saw the blog entries
you refer to, and that bug appears to have been fixed, but I don't see
what use it is in the current system. If it's not possible to get
bacula to purge a
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:48:36AM +, Dermot Beirne wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Here is the pool definitions I'm using.
>
> Is there some way I can get the entire "disk" pool volumes purged when
> they expire, so they are all truncated and all that space is released.
I don't think that you're goin
Hi
I am Implementing Bacula and I have to cypher the backed up data.
Also I don't want that the console and client authentication to be
done clearly over the network.
I want to implement TLS but data are already cyphered via PKI so it
will create a cpu consumption overhead.
Can I configure bacula t
Hi Phil,
Here is the pool definitions I'm using.
Is there some way I can get the entire "disk" pool volumes purged when
they expire, so they are all truncated and all that space is released.
I don't need them once they are copied to tape. Would a migrate job
instead of a copy job work better in
Hi!
On every last sunday of a month I backup my clients to an LTO drive. After all
of these backup jobs are finished, I want to eject the tape. A solution may be
to set a RunAfterJob script for the last executed backup job. But then, the
ejecting depends on this one job.
So I tried the create
30 matches
Mail list logo
