>> So is there a way for me to replace that disk without invalidating the
>> entire backup? Running on Linux with an external SATA / FW enclosure,
>> bacula version 3.0.2
>
> If there is a way to temporarily freeze a job (possible using signals)
> to prevent it from writing anything while using L
On 11/04/10 10:08, Oliver Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'll do backups to disk on a raid6 (28 TB) which is attached via
> fibre channel.
> There will be 50 clients with data ranging from a few MB to 100 GB or
> more for a full backup, tiny files from mail servers as well as large
> database ones.
Graham Keeling schrieb:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 03:34:35PM +0100, Michael Heydenbluth wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to backup/restore an Exchange database.
> >
> > Following configuration:
> > W2K3 R2 Server (32) with Exchange 2003 SP2, bacula-fd 5.0.3 from the
> > download area,
> > ba
Javier> I'm having the same problem that other thread in november 2008:
Javier>
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=BBDDF0B7CFFFCE4FB5110F0A37CE60030942EE%40q.leblancnet.us
Javier> But I can't find a solution ...
I've run into this issue too, but with just regular SCSI tape dr
> "Arnhold" == Arnhold writes:
Arnhold> Because the the link
Arnhold> /dev/tape/by-id/scsi-3500e09e0001af92f-nst is static. When
Arnhold> you change something in yout SCSI configuration the
Arnhold> devicefile /dev/nstX could be changed and you have to change
Arnhold> your config. The symli
Hi there,
We have a variable population of client machines being backed up
by bacula. What I'd like to do is build a query for the bacula DB
that will detect eg. if any clients haven't had a full backup within the
last week. (Yes -- I know there are configuration options to
automatically promot
Why does the click-through report that it failed the test?
http://regress.bacula.org/viewTest.php?onlyfailed&buildid=4916
Mehma
===
On 11/4/10 9:19 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> FYI, the latest svn version of Bacula passes the regression tests with
> PostgreSQL 9.0:
>
>http://regress.bacula.org/b
On Thu, November 4, 2010 5:23 am, rainbow7of9 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> yesterday we deltete our ultrium 2 media
> with
>
> [u...@host]$ mt -f /dev/st0 rewind
> [u...@host]$ mt -f /dev/st0 weof
>
>
> Is it possible to restore after this command, like giving the same label
> name again?
Short answer
FYI, the latest svn version of Bacula passes the regression tests with
PostgreSQL 9.0:
http://regress.bacula.org/buildSummary.php?buildid=4916
--
Dan Langille -- http://langille.org/
--
The Next 800 Companies to Lead
> > On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 15:08:22 +0100, Oliver Hoffmann said:
> >
> > Should I do one big volume pool or better a few smaller ones?
> > I think one big pool is easier to manage.
>
> Consider using more than one pool if you want to keep some backups
> for longer than others, because Bacula can
> > I'll do backups to disk on a raid6 (28 TB) which is attached via
> > fibre channel.
>
> I recommend against using a single raid for backups. If the raid
> controller silently corrupts your raid or there is a file system
> problem you can easily loose all of your backups. I have seen both
> hap
Hello,
yesterday we deltete our ultrium 2 media
with
[u...@host]$ mt -f /dev/st0 rewind
[u...@host]$ mt -f /dev/st0 weof
Is it possible to restore after this command, like giving the same label name
again?
Thanks!
+--
|
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 03:34:35PM +0100, Michael Heydenbluth wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to backup/restore an Exchange database.
>
> Following configuration:
> W2K3 R2 Server (32) with Exchange 2003 SP2, bacula-fd 5.0.3 from the
> download area,
> bacula-sd and bacula-dir (5.0.3 - mysql) comp
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 15:08:22 +0100, Oliver Hoffmann said:
>
> Should I do one big volume pool or better a few smaller ones?
> I think one big pool is easier to manage.
Consider using more than one pool if you want to keep some backups for longer
than others, because Bacula can only recycle c
Hello,
I'm trying to backup/restore an Exchange database.
Following configuration:
W2K3 R2 Server (32) with Exchange 2003 SP2, bacula-fd 5.0.3 from the
download area,
bacula-sd and bacula-dir (5.0.3 - mysql) compiled from source to run on
SLES 9.
Backing up the "Information Store" works and I ca
> I'll do backups to disk on a raid6 (28 TB) which is attached via
> fibre channel.
I recommend against using a single raid for backups. If the raid
controller silently corrupts your raid or there is a file system
problem you can easily loose all of your backups. I have seen both
happen in my 15 y
Hi all,
I'll do backups to disk on a raid6 (28 TB) which is attached via
fibre channel.
There will be 50 clients with data ranging from a few MB to 100 GB or
more for a full backup, tiny files from mail servers as well as large
database ones.
Speed and reliability are both important (as always).
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Mark Luntzel wrote:
> The answer is probably no but...
>
> I can hear the disk currently being written to making bad noises, and
> the speed is extremely slow. Bad disk for sure, about to fail. This is
> at the end of a multi-Terabyte backup, just about 500 gig left
No one?
+--
|This was sent by r...@symentis.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--
-
19 matches
Mail list logo
