'Mingus Dew' wrote:
>Henrik,
>Have you had any problems with slow queries during backup or restore
>jobs? I'm thinking about http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1472
>specifically, and considering that the bacula.File table already has 73
>million rows in it and I haven't even successfully ran the "
Henrik,
Have you had any problems with slow queries during backup or restore
jobs? I'm thinking about
http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1472specifically, and considering
that the bacula.File table already has 73
million rows in it and I haven't even successfully ran the "big" job yet.
Just c
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:59:10 +0200, Frank Altpeter said:
>
> It looks like you could be right with that. Currently the process is
> quite large. "top" reports:
>
> Mem: 3743792k total, 3641244k used, 102548k free,20448k buffers
> Swap: 10490404k total, 115120k used, 10375284k fre
Moin,
sorry to respond so lately, but there was much work these days :-)
2010/10/6 Martin Simmons :
>> On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:36:33 +0200, Frank Altpeter said:
>>
>> I just hit a segmentation fault with my bacula installation. I hope
>> someone can help me how to get this fixed.
>
> The actual
