Re: [Bacula-users] RPM on CentOS

On Wednesday 15 September 2010 04:05:29 pm Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >sudo rpmbuild -bb --define build_postgresql=1 --define "build_centos5 1" > > -- define rhel_version=501 bacula.spec > > Not only do you not need to unpack the srpm to get the the spec to build > from But you shouldn't at all bu

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

On Wednesday 15 September 2010 16:49:18 Martin Simmons wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:53:07 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > > > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 21:54:21 Silver Salonen wrote: > > > On 14.09.2010 18:48, Martin Simmons wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:54:11 +0300, Silve

Re: [Bacula-users] RPM on CentOS

>sudo rpmbuild -bb --define build_postgresql=1 --define "build_centos5 1" -- >define rhel_version=501 bacula.spec Not only do you not need to unpack the srpm to get the the spec to build from But you shouldn't at all build as root? Use a buidroot [1]: $ rpmbuild --rebuild --define build_centos5=1

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:08:17 +0200, Bruno Friedmann said: > > Martin didn't A status for Accurate ( as shown in the extract log ) ? No, there is no special status for Accurate. __Martin -- Start uncovering the man

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:53:07 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 21:54:21 Silver Salonen wrote: > > On 14.09.2010 18:48, Martin Simmons wrote: > > >> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:54:11 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > >> > > >> On Tuesday 14 September 2010 15:16:47 Mart

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

On Wednesday 15 September 2010 08:53:07 Silver Salonen wrote: > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 21:54:21 Silver Salonen wrote: > > On 14.09.2010 18:48, Martin Simmons wrote: > > >> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:54:11 +0300, Silver Salonen said: > > >> > > >> On Tuesday 14 September 2010 15:16:47 Martin S

Re: [Bacula-users] RPM on CentOS

On Wednesday 15 September 2010 01:31:04 pm Hugo Letemplier wrote: > Hi > I am trying to find some RPM's for Bacula on CentOS 5. > i found only for RedHat 7 can i use theses ones or do I need > absolutelly to use CentOS RPMs? > > I know that mostly it works between RH and CentOS rpm's but i want to

[Bacula-users] RPM on CentOS

Hi I am trying to find some RPM's for Bacula on CentOS 5. i found only for RedHat 7 can i use theses ones or do I need absolutelly to use CentOS RPMs? I know that mostly it works between RH and CentOS rpm's but i want to be sure to not have problems in the future. Could you tell me you experience

[Bacula-users] W2008r2 Backup causing issues

I have a W2008r2 server w/ 5.0.3x64 at has recently been nearly impossible to backup. Its running on HP hardware and I have tried updating the NIC firmware and drivers w/o success. What's getting more frustrating is that the 5.0.3 director on CentOSx64 takes forever to cancel the job when manual

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.0.3 backport for debian lenny?

On 14/09/10, Tobias Brink (tobias.br...@gmail.com) wrote: > You should also be careful with the 5.0.2-1 version if you use > Postgres: it broke my database on upgrade. This is fixed in 5.0.2-2 > which is not (yet?) in the backports. See also > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=5912

Re: [Bacula-users] Help with file retention please

> Hi all, > Can someone please help me figure why my catalog file retention only seems > to be 14 days. What I am hoping for, is that the weekly backup jobs should > auto-prune after 15 days, and the file retention to also be 15 days. > Monthly jobs should auto-prune after 65 days, likewise thei