h,
thanks for the hint :-)
At the moment both jobs are using one pool (differential pool). I allready
searched in the archive but haven't found the solution. That's why I wrote the
mail ;-)
Maybe i missed someting.. I will search again.
Thanks,
Stefan
___
I recently updated bacula from 1.38.11 (in service for ~3.5 years) to 5.02.
This was done by:
dumping the bacula data base on the old server (name: parthenon, bacula
client name: parthenon-fd)
copying the MySQL dump to the new server (name: sbia-infr-vbacula)
loading the
On 09/03/10 03:36, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
> nothing is wrong, but as I've said, the challenge here is not to get the old
> Pool, Device etc in the new server.
> Bscan work nicely in this case, no doubt on that. Test prove that.
>
> But we have to re-import them in new defined pool, perharps also
> I am using a Tape library with two drives. Both are set up in the sd.conf.
>
> What can I do to run Backupjobs on both drives at the same time?
>
> At the Moment only one drive (/dev/nst0) is used.
>
> I am using Bacula 2.4.4.
If the jobs go to different pools then bacula should automatically
ch
Hi all,
I am using a Tape library with two drives. Both are set up in the sd.conf.
What can I do to run Backupjobs on both drives at the same time?
At the Moment only one drive (/dev/nst0) is used.
I am using Bacula 2.4.4.
This is the status output:
Device status:
Autochanger "Autochanger" with d
Does anyone have any ideas as to why I am getting this error?
On 8/30/2010 12:43 PM, Brian Debelius wrote:
> Bacula 5.0.3 Ubuntu 10.04 64bit MySQL
>
> Since upgrading to 5.0.3 from 3.0.x I get the following duplicate job
> error when running from a schedule. If I run the copy job manually,
>
Dear all,
we are running Bacula 5.0.3 under SLES 11 in a heterogeneous network
with several Solaris 8/9/10 clients.
I learnt from the list that it is (nearly) not possible to build a
statically-linked Bacula client on Solaris.
Therefore I would like to ask you what's the best (your) way to restor
On 09/02/2010 10:20 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 09/02/10 15:21, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
>> On 09/02/2010 08:33 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>>> I meant to say, bscan will do part of what you want. Depending on the
>>> media, you should be able to either copy the disk volumes to the new
>>> datace
