On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:28 AM, rvent wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am new to Bacula and so far i really like it.
>
> I am testing Bacula and at the moment i am trying to backup to disk.
> Everything seems to be working fine except that the file transfers from the
> client to the server are not very fa
I am using Mac OS to install bacula. when ever i try to install bacula, make
command doesnt work, though i m following all procedure from mannual,
./configure (options) works but make is not working, it gives following error
-
Administrators-MacBook-Pro-4:bacul
Hello,
I am new to Bacula and so far i really like it.
I am testing Bacula and at the moment i am trying to backup to disk. Everything
seems to be working fine except that the file transfers from the client to the
server are not very fast.
The server's interface is a 2Gbps card, the client's i
Hello,
Is is possible to have all the clients save their backups to their local drive
(full, incremental, differential) and then back up those client backups to the
server?
Can i do this from one remote director? Or will every client have to be the
director, storage and client?
I think that t
On Thu, August 5, 2010 02:08, Alan Brown wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>
>>> It does matter if they have data on them.
>>>
>>
>> Agreed. If they were from some other backup program you need to erase
>> them first.
>
> Or if they have last night's Bacula backups on them...
>
> "Label barcodes" i
Guys,
Does anyone knows, briefly, how to backup data on the EMC Clariion cx4
storage, using Bacula?
Regards,
--
Heitor Medrado de Faria
www.bacula.com.br
Msn: hei...@bacula.com.br
Gtalk: heitorfa...@gmail.com
Skype: neocodeheitor
+ 55 71 9132-3349
+55 71 3381-6869
--
On 8/4/2010 6:50 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> On 04/08/10, Dan Langille (d...@langille.org) wrote:
>
>> I think stored procedures would be a good idea. That way, we could
>> improve the functionality without changing the application.
>>
>> That said, we do not at present use stored procedures.
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 10:37:21 -0400
From: Josh Fisher
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula confused about slots on autochanger
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <4c597b21.2050...@pvct.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 8/3/2010 9:20 PM
> Where would that be? I don't see it in /etc/bacula/, and I don't see a
> reference to it in /etc/bacula/scripts/mtx-changer.
Both mtx-changer and mtx-changer.conf should be in
/usr/libexec/bacula
at least they are on my system
John
When deleting a pool via bconsole, the volumes of that pool still exists
in filesystem but are not known anymore to the director and needs to be
deleted manually. When I use the label command:
Connecting to Storage daemon daily_storage at 192.168.2.211:9103 ...
Sending label command for Volume
Thanks to all for your responses. I found the database table upgrade
scripts in the source tree under updatedb. There I found the
update_mysql_tables_10_to_11 which then allowed me to run the
update_mysql_tables under the install directory. All of the daemons
are up and running. My client m
On 8/4/10 4:40 AM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Maria McKinley wrote:
>> It seems that part of the problem I have been having with backup is that
>> bacula is having communication problems with the autochanger. Bacula
>> tells the autochanger to load slot 3, but instead s
Laurent HENRY (EHESS/CRI) wrote:
> Hi, no clever idea for me, just basic thoughts.
>
> what is the output of an update slots command ?
>
> what happen when you ask a 'mount' request from slot 3 ?
>
>
Through some trickery (loaded the tape into the drive from outside
bacula, and then mounted i
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:21 PM, sid009 wrote:
> Following is the list of Volumes I have:
>
>
> *list volumes
> Pool: Default
> +-++---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+
> | MediaId | Vo
Following is the list of Volumes I have:
*list volumes
Pool: Default
+-++---+-+-+--+--+-+--+---+---+-+
| MediaId | VolumeName | VolStatus | Enabled | VolBytes
| VolFiles
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:18 PM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
>> John Drescher wrote:
>>
It does matter if they have data on them.
>>>
>>> Agreed. If they were from some other backup program you need to erase
>>> them first.
>>
>> Or if t
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>
>>> It does matter if they have data on them.
>>>
>>
>> Agreed. If they were from some other backup program you need to erase
>> them first.
>
> Or if they have last night's Bacula backups on them...
>
> "Label barcode
From: Brian White
>Phil Stracchino wrote:
>On 08/04/10 11:14, Brian White wrote:
>>I've been using Bacula 2.2.5 as my primary backup software for several
>>>years now and am very happy. As we move to newer version of our linux
>>>operating system I'm having issues with the client so I've decided
John Drescher wrote:
>> It does matter if they have data on them.
>>
>
> Agreed. If they were from some other backup program you need to erase
> them first.
Or if they have last night's Bacula backups on them...
"Label barcodes" is an extremely dangerous command and should be used
with ext
Thanks. I don't know MySQL very well. Do you know how I would go
about finding the current DB schema version?
Thanks.
Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 08/04/10 11:14, Brian White wrote:
I've been using Bacula 2.2.5 as my primary backup software for several
years now and am very happy.
On 08/04/10 11:14, Brian White wrote:
> I've been using Bacula 2.2.5 as my primary backup software for several
> years now and am very happy. As we move to newer version of our linux
> operating system I'm having issues with the client so I've decided it's
> about time to upgrade. My plan is to u
2010/8/4 Brian White :
> I've been using Bacula 2.2.5 as my primary backup software for several
> years now and am very happy. As we move to newer version of our linux
> operating system I'm having issues with the client so I've decided it's
> about time to upgrade. My plan is to upgrade to the l
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Alan Brown wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
It is not correct to manually label tapes in an autochanger if you
have one that has a barcode reader. With a barcode reader you issue
label barcodes from the console after you issue update slots.
>>>
>>>
John Drescher wrote:
>>> It is not correct to manually label tapes in an autochanger if you
>>> have one that has a barcode reader. With a barcode reader you issue
>>> label barcodes from the console after you issue update slots.
>> You assume you have a changer full of blank tapes.
>>
>
> It does
>> It is not correct to manually label tapes in an autochanger if you
>> have one that has a barcode reader. With a barcode reader you issue
>> label barcodes from the console after you issue update slots.
>
> You assume you have a changer full of blank tapes.
>
It does not matter if some are alre
I've been using Bacula 2.2.5 as my primary backup software for several
years now and am very happy. As we move to newer version of our linux
operating system I'm having issues with the client so I've decided it's
about time to upgrade. My plan is to upgrade to the latest stable
version 5.0.2. I'
Dan Langille wrote:
> Any failed jobs about that time?
>
Yes, but even with what was left in the spool directories the disk was
nowhere near full, nor were the directories anywhere near the 100Gb mark.
I've had it decide to start despooling at 60kB at times. Usually it's
more like 5Mb to 8Gb.
On 8/3/2010 9:20 PM, Maria McKinley wrote:
> It seems that part of the problem I have been having with backup is that
> bacula is having communication problems with the autochanger. Bacula
> tells the autochanger to load slot 3, but instead slot 2 is loaded:
On some systems, (BSD?) slot numbers a
> It is not correct to manually label tapes in an autochanger if you
> have one that has a barcode reader. With a barcode reader you issue
> label barcodes from the console after you issue update slots. For the
> label barcodes I put all new volumes in the Scratch pool.
>
Hi drescherjm
Thanks
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Drescher
Date: Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with Volumes
To: Carlo Filippetto
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Carlo Filippetto
wrote:
> AZZZ
> I create the volumes and late I add thje 'Duration'!!!
>
> th
> Thanks for your prompt response. I looked at the link you just provided when
> I was setting up Bacula. Just a bit more information, when I was labelling
> the volumes, Bacula was not auto-labelling any of the tapes so I had to
> simulate the barcodes by following the steps in "Simulating Barc
Hi rory
Thanks for your prompt response. I looked at the link you just provided when I
was setting up Bacula. Just a bit more information, when I was labelling the
volumes, Bacula was not auto-labelling any of the tapes so I had to simulate
the barcodes by following the steps in "Simulating Bar
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Maria McKinley wrote:
> It seems that part of the problem I have been having with backup is that
> bacula is having communication problems with the autochanger. Bacula
> tells the autochanger to load slot 3, but instead slot 2 is loaded:
>
> *messages
> 03-Aug 18:14
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Carlo Filippetto
wrote:
> The problem is that!
>
> I have head made 5 volumes, I don't let Bacula to create them, I wold like
> that every single volume contains only a 'daily' backup... In this
> installation I have only 12 client, and I want that all the backup of
On 04/08/10, sid009 (bacula-fo...@backupcentral.com) wrote:
> I am new to Bacula and an average Linux user. I am trying to setup
> Bacula to work with our HP LTO4 Autochanger (7 slots + 1 mail slot). I
> have managed to label all the tapes and I can see all the volumes
> listed via bconsole. The pr
Hi Guys,
I am new to Bacula and an average Linux user. I am trying to setup Bacula to
work with our HP LTO4 Autochanger (7 slots + 1 mail slot). I have managed to
label all the tapes and I can see all the volumes listed via bconsole. The
problem I am having is Auto-rotating the tapes. Right now
On 04/08/10, Dan Langille (d...@langille.org) wrote:
> I think stored procedures would be a good idea. That way, we could
> improve the functionality without changing the application.
>
> That said, we do not at present use stored procedures. We'd have to
> proceed carefully.
Fair enough. Can
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 11:12:14 +0800, Ceejay Cervantes said:
>
> I'm using Bacula 5.0.2 on CentOS 5.5. I've created a DisktoCatalog level
> verify job as a way to check things. I'm getting the warning below even
> though they are on disk:
>
> Warning: The following files are in the Catalog but
On 8/4/2010 6:28 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> On 03/08/10, Dan Langille (d...@langille.org) wrote:
>> On 8/3/2010 7:09 PM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>
>>> Yes, a batch insert is faster than a specfic insert, but the latter
>>> should be done at the "written-to-tape" transaction time, and could
On 04/08/10, Marc Cousin (cousinm...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Changes to one part of Bacula has to be compatible with all other parts
> > of Bacula. For example, given that we support SQLite, PostgreSQL, and
> > MySQL, we have to keep each in mind. Yes, it's a compromise.
> Moreover, yes, Postgr
On 03/08/10, Dan Langille (d...@langille.org) wrote:
> On 8/3/2010 7:09 PM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> > Yes, a batch insert is faster than a specfic insert, but the latter
> > should be done at the "written-to-tape" transaction time, and could be
> > done asynchronously, but in a transaction.
>
The problem is that!
I have head made 5 volumes, I don't let Bacula to create them, I wold like
that every single volume contains only a 'daily' backup... In this
installation I have only 12 client, and I want that all the backup of this
night will go into that single volumes...
The retention per
42 matches
Mail list logo
