On Tuesday 20 July 2010 22:10:45 Dan Langille wrote:
> On 7/20/2010 12:20 PM, Paul Mather wrote:
> > I'm running FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE (RELENG_8). Recently, the
sysutils/bacula-{client,server} ports were updated to 5.0.2. Unfortunately,
when updating via portmaster, the bacula-client port upda
I am looking at doing base jobs to help avoid tying up systems for too
long though until multi-threading for the FD arrives it's kind of moot
as it takes the same amount of time with large file sets.I use the
MD5 checks as a means to verify file integrity and to restore if a file
gets cor
As far as I know it was running at about 70MB/s. It could have been
shoe-shining a bit though, not really sure.
-John
-Original Message-
From: Martin Simmons [mailto:mar...@lispworks.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 1:26 PM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula
Please ignore this thread. It was early morning, and I had an issue with one
of the KDE "konsoles" I had opened at the time.
Typing "reset" at the shell prompt cleared up the problem within that terminal.
One of those mornings where three things seemingly unrelated we all going on
at once.
sigh
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 07:50:41 -0600, May, John said:
>
> Monday morning, 3 days later and it is still restoring. It's finished about
> 600GB, which is less than half of what is on the two tapes. I'm pretty sure
> that only one job was written to the tape at the time of backup. Also, I
> th
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:36:41 +0100, Mister IT Guru said:
>
> Please excuse the attached txt, but putting it on pastebin doesn't last
> forever
>
> In this setup, if I update the file set, the backup begins again as a
> FULL backup. This why would this be the case?
>
> Ran TESTBASE, to cr
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 05:51:37 -0500, Steve Costaras said:
>
> I am running v5.0.2 against some clients with many files (5-10
> million). I have and want the fileset option of accurate=mcs5 (md5
> checks) when I do a full backup of the clients. However I DO NOT want
> to do a md5 check
John,
I have 4 pools total, two pools defined by me: Offsite and Onsite and two that
I believe are default to Bacula: Catalog and Scratch.
Offsite retention period is 6 months, Onsite is 3 months. Once a volume is
marked full from Onsite the volume goes on the shelf to the back of the stack.
W
Are you using a separate volume per job? In that case, you could simply forego
a copy job altogether and just copy the disk files themselves. 100 years from
now, you may have a problem simply reading the database. So it may be easier
and better to just rely on the files themselves. Write a shell
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Jeremiah D. Jester
wrote:
> Bacula is asking for a volume that is no longer in the changer because it was
> marked as full and sent offsite. As you can see the volume was last written
> to on July 9th.
>
> Current snippet for this volume 'list media pool=Offsite'
Bacula is asking for a volume that is no longer in the changer because it was
marked as full and sent offsite. As you can see the volume was last written to
on July 9th.
Current snippet for this volume 'list media pool=Offsite' below.
103 | KL0451 | Append| 1 | 163,962,667,008 |
On 7/21/2010 8:39 AM, Alex Huth wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I want to be sure if have understand the periods and there relationship
> to a possible restore.
>
> The file retention period define the possibility to restore files over
> the given period. If i have the following schedule, how do i have to set
On 07/21/10 09:26, Enrico van Goor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We make backups of about 200 server at the moment, to disk. Twice a week
> a Full backup and 5 times a week an incremental. Every day is a
> different pool, so the tape drives won't interfere with the backup to
> disk and vice versa. We write
Hi all,
We make backups of about 200 server at the moment, to disk. Twice a week
a Full backup and 5 times a week an incremental. Every day is a
different pool, so the tape drives won't interfere with the backup to
disk and vice versa. We write the data to tape using a copy job.
The tapes have a
Hi,
2010/7/21 :
> Can you post your configuration for the Jobs and Pools? That thing with the
> incremental jobs shouldn't happen.
Sure, I've anonymized the relevant config files (hopefully all that is
needed) and put it on pastebin here:
http://racoon.pastebin.com/E1LurCY7
> As for the "fork
Hello!
I want to be sure if have understand the periods and there relationship
to a possible restore.
The file retention period define the possibility to restore files over
the given period. If i have the following schedule, how do i have to set
the retention periods to have always two full sets
Can you post your configuration for the Jobs and Pools? That thing with the
incremental jobs shouldn't happen.
As for the "forking": I have that same issue, every Mail has the same subject
but I don't think you can change that (I might be wrong).
>Hi list,
>
>I'm using bacula-5.0.2 with a di
I recently posted here that I had written a Xymon script to monitor Bacula.
The script basically uses the bconsole program to run a "status dir" followed
by a "list jobs", like so:
echo "status dir" | /usr/sbin/bconsole
(do some grepping etc)
followed by
echo "list jobs" | /usr/sbin/bconsole
(
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:38:36 +1200, Craig Miskell said:
>
> Alex Chekholko wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:11:49 +1200
> > Craig Miskell wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>It looks like I need to beef up "Maximum Block Size" to get good
> >> performance out of our LTO-4 tape drives.
> >>
> >>
I am running v5.0.2 against some clients with many files (5-10
million). I have and want the fileset option of accurate=mcs5 (md5
checks) when I do a full backup of the clients. However I DO NOT want
to do a md5 check when I do differentials/incremental's due to the fact
that it takes day
Hi list,
I'm using bacula-5.0.2 with a disk storage and a Tandberg 24-tape
changer system to backup about 130 server systems. The intention was
to do a disk based full backup once a week and afterwards copy these
full backups on tape. Currently, I'm using three storage devices
(FileStorage, FileSt
Please excuse the attached txt, but putting it on pastebin doesn't last
forever
In this setup, if I update the file set, the backup begins again as a
FULL backup. This why would this be the case?
Ran TESTBASE, to create the basejob - no errors
Ran TESTJOB, to see if anything else will be backed
On 21/07/10 03:27, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 07/20/10 10:15, Mister IT Guru wrote:
>
>> I've been reading up on some of the new features, and one of them is a
>> base job. Do I need to do an actual full backup to create a base, or can
>> I make one from existing backed up data?
>>
> You
23 matches
Mail list logo
